ASSESSING AVAILABLE CARBON - COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES ACROSS SELECTED FOREST SOILS

被引:124
作者
DAVIDSON, EA
GALLOWAY, LF
STRAND, MK
机构
[1] N CAROLINA STATE UNIV, DEPT FORESTRY, RALEIGH, NC 27695 USA
[2] OBERLIN COLL, DEPT BIOL, OBERLIN, OH 44074 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00103628709367802
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Available carbon (C) is defined as soil organic C that heterotrophic microorganisms can readily utilize as an energy and C source. Several techniques for assessing available C have been described in the literature, but none has become standard. Four of these methods, (i) mineralizable C (Min-C), (ii) cold water soluble C (CWS-C), (iii) boiling water extractable C (BWE-C), (iv) and total C (Tot-C), were ocmpared to each other and to a denitrification potential (DP) bioassay of C availability. These comparisons were made across selected forest soils which exhibited wide ranges of textural composition and organic C content and which ranged in acidity from pH 3.1 to 5.4. Carbon mineralized to CO2 during a 7 day aerobic incubation of field-moist soil (Min-C) provided the best prediction of DP. Min-C also appeared to distinguish between available C and refractory C in a soil with high Tot-C. Air drying increased CWS-C levels 2- to 10-fold. The C made soluble by drying and rewetting was strongly correlated with Min-C in all but one soil sample. Although the quantity of CWS-C increased, drying and rewetting did not appear to affect the mineralizable quality of C extracted. None of the procedures studied provides an unequivocal measure of available C. Nevertheless, Min-C appears promising as a standard procedure because: (i) it mesured C presumably mineralized by microorganisms, (ii) it proved effective in predicting DP under incubation conditions that were mostly C limited, and (iii)it was the simplest of the procedures examined.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 64
页数:20
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JPE, 1983, METHODS SOIL ANAL PA, P831
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43
[3]   COLORIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SUGARS [J].
ASHWELL, G .
METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1957, 3 :73-105
[4]   ORGANIC-MATTER AVAILABILITY FOR DENITRIFICATION IN SOILS OF DIFFERENT TEXTURES AND DRAINAGE CLASSES [J].
BEAUCHAMP, EG ;
GALE, C ;
YEOMANS, JC .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1980, 11 (12) :1221-1233
[5]  
Birch H. F., 1958, Plant and Soil, V10, P9, DOI 10.1007/BF01343734
[7]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DENITRIFICATION CAPACITIES OF SOILS AND TOTAL, WATER-SOLUBLE AND READILY DECOMPOSABLE SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER [J].
BURFORD, JR ;
BREMNER, JM .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1975, 7 (06) :389-394
[9]   EVALUATION OF THE MOST PROBABLE NUMBER METHOD FOR ENUMERATING DENITRIFYING BACTERIA [J].
DAVIDSON, EA ;
STRAND, MK ;
GALLOWAY, LF .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (03) :642-645
[10]   CHEMICAL TESTS FOR POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE NITROGEN IN SOIL [J].
JENKINSON, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1968, 19 (03) :160-+