DIFFERENTIAL RIGHT SHIFTS IN THE DOSE-RESPONSE CURVE FOR INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AND SUFENTANIL AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS-INTENSITY

被引:59
作者
DIRIG, DM
YAKSH, TL
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO, DEPT PHARMACOL, LA JOLLA, CA 92103 USA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO, DEPT ANESTHESIOL, LA JOLLA, CA 92103 USA
关键词
SUFENTANIL; MORPHINE; INTRINSIC ACTIVITY; SPINAL; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1016/0304-3959(95)00006-E
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
To assess effects of stimulus intensity, dose-response curves in rats for radiant heat-evoked withdrawal of the hind paw was assessed after the intrathecal (i.t.) injection of sufentanil and morphine, mu-opioid agonists differing in intrinsic activity, at Low, Medium, and High stimulus intensities. Baseline latencies observed at the 3 intensities were: low = 14.5 +/- 0.3; medium = 8.9 +/- 0.2; high = 5.7 +/- 0.1 sec. After i.t, administration of sufentanil or morphine, there was a dose-dependent, naloxone-reversible elevation in nociceptive threshold. With increased stimulus intensity, there was a right shift in the dose-response curves with morphine exhibiting a greater magnitude right shift than that of sufentanil. Dose ratios (ED(50) (Medium)/ED(50) (Low) and ED(50) (High)/ED(50) (Low)) with 95% CI for sufentanil were, respectively, 2.5 (2.2-2.9) and 7.7 (6.7-8.9), and the dose ratio for morphine (ED(50) (Medium)/ED(50) (Low)) was 34 (28-41). At the highest intensity, due to a plateau in the morphine dose-response curve, ED(50) and dose ratio calculations could not be performed. The present study supports the pharmacological model of receptor occupancy, such that the higher efficacy receptor agonist, sufentanil, demonstrated a lesser magnitude right shift than the lower efficacy agonist, morphine, while at the high stimulus intensity, morphine but not sufentanil, was a partial agonist.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ADAMS JU, 1990, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V255, P1027
[2]  
ARENS JF, 1972, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V51, P901
[3]  
BAILEY PL, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V70, P8
[4]  
BOVILL JG, 1984, ANESTH ANALG, V63, P1081
[5]   EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL AND CHEMICAL STIMULATION OF FINE MUSCLE AFFERENTS UPON PRIMATE SPINOTHALAMIC TRACT CELLS [J].
FOREMAN, RD ;
SCHMIDT, RF ;
WILLIS, WD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1979, 286 (JAN) :215-231
[6]   COMPARISON OF DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS AND OF RELATIVE EFFICACIES OF SELECTED AGONISTS ACTING ON PARASYMPATHETIC RECEPTORS [J].
FURCHGOTT, RF ;
BURSZTYN, P .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1967, 144 (A2) :882-+
[7]  
Furchgott RF, 1966, ADV DRUG RES, V3, P21
[8]   RELEASE OF SUBSTANCE-P FROM THE CAT SPINAL-CORD [J].
GO, VLW ;
YAKSH, TL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1987, 391 :141-167
[9]   THE ENFLURANE SPARING EFFECT OF SUFENTANIL IN DOGS [J].
HALL, RI ;
MURPHY, MR ;
HUG, CC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (04) :518-525
[10]   A NEW AND SENSITIVE METHOD FOR MEASURING THERMAL NOCICEPTION IN CUTANEOUS HYPERALGESIA [J].
HARGREAVES, K ;
DUBNER, R ;
BROWN, F ;
FLORES, C ;
JORIS, J .
PAIN, 1988, 32 (01) :77-88