PRIMARY PERITONEAL CARCINOMA AFTER PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY IN WOMEN WITH A FAMILY HISTORY OF OVARIAN-CANCER - A REPORT OF THE GILDA-RADNER-FAMILIAL-OVARIAN-CANCER-REGISTRY

被引:0
|
作者
PIVER, MS
JISHI, MF
TSUKADA, Y
NAVA, G
机构
[1] Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York
关键词
FAMILIAL OVARIAN CANCER; PERITONEAL CARCINOMA; PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/1097-0142(19930501)71:9<2751::AID-CNCR2820710911>3.0.CO;2-J
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. According to previous reports, primary peritoneal carcinoma indistinguishable from primary ovarian adenocarcinoma had developed in five women with a history of familial ovarian cancer who had undergone prophylactic oophorectomy. Methods. The records from the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry were reviewed for instances of prophylactic oophorectomy and cases of primary peritoneal carcinoma occurring after prophylactic oophorectomy. Results. From 1981 through July 1992, the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry accessioned 931 families (a total of 2221 cases of familial ovarian cancer). Currently, 324 women in these families have undergone prophylactic oophorectomy as a preventive measure against the subsequent development of ovarian cancer. Primary peritoneal carcinoma indistinguishable histologically from primary ovarian adenocarcinoma has developed in six of these women 1-27 years after prophylactic oophorectomy. Conclusions. Based on this finding and other reports of such primary peritoneal carcinoma, a prospective international study is planned. This study will compare the incidence of peritoneal carcinoma in first- or second-degree relatives who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy because of a family history of ovarian cancer with that of those who did not undergo prophylactic oophorectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:2751 / 2755
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] FAMILIAL OVARIAN-CANCER - A REPORT OF 658 FAMILIES FROM THE GILDA-RADNER-FAMILIAL-OVARIAN-CANCER-REGISTRY 1981-1991
    PIVER, MS
    BAKER, TR
    JISHI, MF
    SANDECKI, AM
    TSUKADA, Y
    NATARAJAN, N
    METTLIN, CJ
    BLAKE, CA
    CANCER, 1993, 71 (02) : 582 - 588
  • [2] Comparative study of ovarian cancer histopathology by registry pathologists and referral pathologists: A study by the Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry
    Piver, MS
    Tsukada, Y
    Werness, BA
    DiCioccio, RA
    Whittemore, AS
    Ponder, BAJ
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) : 166 - 170
  • [3] Psychosocial correlates of intention to undergo prophylactic oophorectomy among women with a family history of ovarian cancer
    Fang, CY
    Miller, SM
    Malick, J
    Babb, J
    Engstrom, PF
    Daly, MB
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (05) : 424 - 431
  • [4] OVARIAN-CARCINOMA - A REVIEW OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF FAMILIAL RISK-FACTORS AND THE ROLE OF PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY IN CANCER PREVENTION
    NGUYEN, HN
    AVERETTE, HE
    JANICEK, M
    CANCER, 1994, 74 (02) : 545 - 555
  • [5] The role of peritoneal cytology at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of familial ovarian/tubal cancer
    Manchanda, Ranjit
    Drapkin, Ronny
    Jacobs, Ian
    Menon, Usha
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 124 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [6] Factors Associated with Altered Long-Term Well-Being After Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy Among Women at Increased Hereditary Risk for Breast and Ovarian Cancer
    Touboul, Cyril
    Uzan, Catherine
    Ichante, Jean Laurent
    Caron, Olivier
    Dunant, Ariane
    Dauchy, Sarah
    Gouy, Sebastien
    de Paillerets, Brigitte Bressac
    Morice, Philippe
    Delaloge, Suzette
    ONCOLOGIST, 2011, 16 (09): : 1250 - 1257
  • [7] Intra-abdominal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy in women of hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome kindreds associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
    Casey, MJ
    Synder, C
    Bewtra, C
    Narod, SA
    Watson, P
    Lynch, HT
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (02) : 457 - 467