EFFECTS OF SETTLEMENT AND FIRE SUPPRESSION ON LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE

Natural landscapes subject to disturbances have a patchy structure that is important to many species living in these landscapes. This structure may be modified when the disturbance regime is altered by either climatic change or human influences (e.g., fire suppression), yet little is known about how this structure will change. I used a GIS (geographic information system)-based spatial model and data on historical changes in fire sizes and intervals to simulate the effects of settlement and fire suppression on the structure of the landscape in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Minnesota. I used seven measures to assess change in landscape structure. Settlement and fire suppression altered some but not all components of landscape structure. Settlement produced an immediate significant effect on some measures (age, shape, Shannon diversity, richness, and angular second moment), but no effect on other measures (size, fractal dimension). In contrast, suppression produced an immediate response in fewer measures (shape, Shannon diversity, richness), a delay for several decades in the case of some measures (age, fractal dimension), and a delay for hundreds of years in the case of other measures (size, angular second moment). Landscapes that have been altered by settlement and fire suppression cannot be restored using traditional methods of prescribed burning, which will simply produce further alteration. Causes of landscape change cannot be separated without control landscapes that lack prescribed burning, fire suppression, or other alterations of the natural fire regime.