CT Simulation to Evaluate of Pelvic Lymph Node Coverage in Conventional Radiotherapy Fields Based on Bone and Vessels Landmarks in Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:4
作者
Kashi, Amir Shahram Yousefi [1 ]
Khaledi, Samira [2 ]
Houshyari, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Fac Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Prostate Cancer; Radiotherapy Planning; Computed Tomography (CT) Simulation; Pelvic Vessels; Pelvic Lymph Nodes;
D O I
10.17795/ijcp-6233
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Radiotherapy is the gold standard for treatment of prostrate cancer as it can cover an adequate area of tissues at risk for metastasis. Objectives: We evaluated the Pelvic lymph node coverage of conventional radiotherapy fields based on bone and vessels landmarks using computed tomography (CT) simulation in patients with prostate cancer referred to Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital. Patients and Methods: In this cross sectional study, 40 patients with prostate cancer at the Stage T1c to T3b were studied. Pelvic lymph nodes were contoured by using pelvic vessels as surrogate markers. The distances were measured at different points of anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral fields and distances > 5 mm or more between the contoured nodes and the field borders. Results: Mean and standard deviation of the aortic bifurcation from the superior border was 4.73 +/- 1.16 cm, the distance of common iliac bifurcation from the superior border was 1.11 +/- 1.25 cm, the mean (SD) distance of right external iliac from the lateral border of AP field was 2.06 +/- 0.48 cm and for left external iliac artery was 1.90 +/- 0.56 cm. The distance of the external iliac artery from the anterior border of the lateral field was 2.30 +/- 0.74 cm. The distance of the external iliac artery from pelvic rim was 0.59 +/- 0.59 cm, distance of bifurcation of iliac from sacroiliac joint was 0.82 +/- 1.01 cm, the size of the pelvic rim was 12.30 +/- 0.64 cm, sacral width was 8.29 +/- 1.01 cm, anterior promontory symphysis distance was 12.02 +/- 0.92 cm and posterior promontory symphysis distance was 10.98 +/- 0.73 cm. Conclusions: We observed that conventional radiotherapy using CT simulation based on bone and vessels landmarks provided adequate coverage of pelvic lymph nodes in our patients with prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Ten-Year Outcomes of High-Dose, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Alicikus, Zumre A.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Pei, Xin
    Hunt, Margie
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Cox, Brett
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2011, 117 (07) : 1429 - 1437
  • [2] Bony landmarks are not an adequate substitute for lymphangiography in defining pelvic lymph node location for the treatment of cervical cancer with radiotherapy
    Bonin, SR
    Lanciano, RM
    Corn, BW
    Hogan, WM
    Hartz, WH
    Hanks, GE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (01): : 167 - 172
  • [3] Lymphangiogram-assisted lymph node target delineation for patients with gynecologic malignancies
    Chao, KSC
    Lin, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (04): : 1147 - 1152
  • [4] Use of CT simulation for treatment of cervical cancer to assess the adequacy of lymph node coverage of conventional pelvic fields based on bony landmarks
    Finlay, MH
    Ackerman, I
    Tirona, RG
    Hamilton, P
    Barbera, L
    Thomas, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (01): : 205 - 209
  • [5] GYNECOLOGIC RADIOTHERAPY FIELDS DEFINED BY INTRAOPERATIVE MEASUREMENTS
    GREER, BE
    KOH, WJ
    FIGGE, DC
    RUSSELL, AH
    CAIN, JM
    TAMIMI, HK
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (03) : 421 - 424
  • [6] CONVENTIONAL 4-FIELD PELVIC RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUE WITHOUT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-TREATMENT PLANNING IN CANCER OF THE CERVIX - POTENTIAL GEOGRAPHIC MISS AND ITS IMPACT ON PELVIC CONTROL
    KIM, RY
    MCGINNIS, LS
    SPENCER, SA
    MEREDITH, RF
    JENNELLE, RLS
    SALTER, MM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01): : 109 - 112
  • [7] Radiation fields in gynecologic oncology: correlation of soft tissue (surgical) to radiologic landmarks
    McAlpine, J
    Schlaerth, JB
    Lim, P
    Chen, D
    Eisenkop, SM
    Spirtos, NM
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 92 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [8] ROLE OF BIPEDAL LYMPHANGIOGRAM IN RADIATION TREATMENT PLANNING FOR CERVIX CANCER
    PENDLEBURY, SC
    CAHILL, S
    CRANDON, AJ
    BULL, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (04): : 959 - 962
  • [9] ANALYSIS OF PELVIC TUMOR-CONTROL AND IMPACT ON SURVIVAL IN CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX TREATED WITH RADIATION-THERAPY ALONE
    PEREZ, CA
    KUSKE, RR
    CAMEL, HM
    GALAKATOS, AE
    HEDERMAN, MA
    KAO, MS
    WALZ, BJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 14 (04): : 613 - 621
  • [10] Recent Achievements and Future Developments in Advanced and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: Trials of the Gynecologic Oncology Group
    Tewari, Krishnansu S.
    Monk, Bradley J.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2009, 36 (02) : 170 - 180