Tools and methods of innovation in the open science: open peer review

被引:3
作者
Cassella, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Torino, Biblioteca Norberto Bobbio, Turin, Italy
来源
AIB STUDI | 2018年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2426/aibstudi-11714
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The article offers a first reflection in Italy on the practices of open peer review (OPR), an umbrella term used to refer to several open and innovative ways to exercise the peer review in the scholarly communication web domain. OPR helps to overcome the drawbacks of anonymous traditional peer review. It improves the review process by making it more open and transparent and enhances the dialogue between scientists within the same discipline and between different disciplines. The paper also discusses the topic of the qualitative relevance of OPR. In conclusion, the author claims that OPR is still far from replacing traditional peer review models but it can become a valid support to create a better qualitative research evaluation system.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 107
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ESB FORUM 0221
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CONFR VAL PEER VAL B
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, B TELEMATICO FILOSOF
[4]  
Baccini A, 2016, SCIENTOMETRICS, V108, P1651, DOI 10.1007/s11192-016-1929-y
[5]  
Baccini Alberto, 2012, ROARS 0109
[6]  
Baccini Alberto, 2010, VALUTARE RICERCA SCI
[7]  
Baccini Alberto, 2010, VALUTARE RICERCA SCI, P41
[8]  
Banfi Antonio, 2012, ROARS 0824
[9]  
Biagetti Maria Teresa, 2017, VALUTARE RICERCA NEL, P32
[10]  
Biancu Bonaria, 2017, BIBLIOTECA APERTA TE, P102