FACTOR-ANALYSES OF POOLED HAND QUESTIONNAIRE DATA ARE OF QUESTIONABLE VALUE

被引:18
作者
PETERS, M
MURPHY, K
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Guelph
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80183-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A number of researches have used factor analyses and principal components analyses on handedness questionnaire data in order to learn something about handedness. However, these researchers have analyzed pooled data from righthanders and lefthanders. The practice of pooling groups that are known in advance to be heterogeneous is highly questionable because it is not possible to disentangle the sources of variance that are contributed by within group differences from those that arise from between group differences. The factor structure and item loadings that result from pooled data are misleading and cannot inform meaningfully about the relation of hand preference to handedness. Similar problems can be anticipated in other neuropsychological applications of factor analysis, where data from heterogeneous groups is pooled.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 314
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BOOKSTEIN FL, 1990, MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIO, V25, P73
[2]  
Bookstein FL., 1992, MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS L
[3]   MEASURING HANDEDNESS WITH QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BRYDEN, MP .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1977, 15 (4-5) :617-624
[4]   DID THROWING STONES SHAPE HOMINID BRAIN EVOLUTION [J].
CALVIN, WH .
ETHOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1982, 3 (03) :115-124
[5]  
CHATFIELD C, 1980, INTRO MULTIVARIATE A
[6]   THE MEASUREMENT OF HANDEDNESS - A CROSS-CULTURAL-COMPARISON OF SAMPLES FROM ENGLAND AND PAPUA-NEW-GUINEA [J].
CONNOLLY, KJ ;
BISHOP, DVM .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1992, 30 (01) :13-26
[7]   HANDEDNESS IS NOT A UNIDIMENSIONAL TRAIT [J].
HEALEY, JM ;
LIEDERMAN, J ;
GESCHWIND, N .
CORTEX, 1986, 22 (01) :33-53
[8]  
KANG Y, 1992, MAY TENNET C MONTR
[9]  
KRONENBERG JL, 1983, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V74, P33
[10]   THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS: THE EDINBURGH INVENTORY [J].
OLDFIELD, RC .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1971, 9 (01) :97-113