A NEW DESCRIPTOR OF THE DUAL CHARACTER OF THE INPUT-OUTPUT BEHAVIOR OF THE COCHLEA, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO ESTIMATION OF BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY ALTERNATING POLARITY CLICKS

被引:7
作者
DELTENRE, P [1 ]
MANSBACH, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LIBRES BRUXELLES,BRUGMANN & HUDERF CAMPUS,B-1020 BRUSSELS,BELGIUM
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1993年 / 88卷 / 05期
关键词
BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS; CLICK POLARITY; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; PLUS-MINUS AVERAGE; LATENCY-INTENSITY FUNCTIONS; COCHLEAR PHYSIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(93)90014-G
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The signal-to-noise ratio based on a plus-minus average for residual noise estimation has been systematically computed for brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) evoked by alternating polarity clicks from threshold up to 100 dB nHL in subjects with normal cochlear function. The plus-minus averages have exhibited a systematic dual behaviour in close correspondence with the ''L'' and ''H'' portions of the latency-intensity functions: from threshold up to 50 dB SL (''L'' segment) they faithfully reflect the post-averaging residual noise. From 50 dB SL upwards the plus-minus averages are contaminated by a signal identified as the differential potential between rarefaction and condensation responses. The plus-minus average is therefore an unreliable indicator of the post-averaging residual noise when alternating polarity clicks louder than 50 dB are used. These findings suggest that for intensities corresponding to the ''L'' (steep) part of the latency-intensity function, when inner hair cell excitation is dependent on active amplification by the outer hair cells, no difference exists between rarefaction and condensation responses. By contrast, once levels at which the inner hair cells can be directly stimulated are reached, responses to rarefaction and condensation clicks become different.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 388
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]  
Davis H, 1981, Am J Otolaryngol, V2, P153, DOI 10.1016/S0196-0709(81)80034-8
[12]   OBJECTIVE DETECTION OF AVERAGED AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES [J].
DON, M ;
ELBERLING, C ;
WARING, M .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1984, 13 (04) :219-228
[13]  
EGGERMONT JJ, 1974, AUDIOLOGY, V13, P1
[14]  
EGGERMONT JJ, 1974, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V316, P1
[15]   QUALITY ESTIMATION OF AVERAGED AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES [J].
ELBERLING, C ;
DON, M .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1984, 13 (03) :187-197
[16]  
Elberling C., 1973, SCAND AUDIOL, V2, P151, DOI [10.3109/01050397309044948, DOI 10.3109/01050397309044948]
[17]   AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES TO SINGLE-SLOPE STIMULI - THE INFLUENCE OF STEEPNESS AND POLARITY [J].
GERULL, G ;
MROWINSKI, D ;
JANSSEN, T ;
ANFT, D .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1987, 16 (04) :227-235
[18]   PROLONGATION OF THE COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC IN MAN - COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC RINGING [J].
GIBBIN, KP ;
MASON, SM ;
KENT, SE .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1983, 95 (1-2) :13-18
[19]   MIDDLE-EAR CHARACTERISTICS OF ANESTHETIZED CATS [J].
GUINAN, JJ ;
PEAKE, WT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1967, 41 (05) :1237-+
[20]   ROLE OF AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE IN THE SELECTION OF HEARING-AIDS [J].
HECOX, KE .
EAR AND HEARING, 1983, 4 (01) :51-55