FALLOUT RISK FOLLOWING A MAJOR NUCLEAR ATTACK ON THE UNITED-STATES

被引:6
|
作者
HARVEY, TF [1 ]
SHAPIRO, CS [1 ]
WITTLER, RF [1 ]
机构
[1] SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIV, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94132 USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 1992年 / 62卷 / 01期
关键词
FALLOUT; NUCLEAR WAR; DOSE; RISK ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1097/00004032-199201000-00003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fallout distributions are calculated for nuclear attacks on the contiguous United States. Four attack scenarios are treated, including counterforce and counterforce-countervalue attacks, for meteorological conditions associated with a typical day in summer and one in winter. The countervalue attacks contain mostly airbursts. To determine fallout effects, the population surviving the prompt effects is first calculated. For the prompt effects, a "conflagration-type" model is used. The counterforce attack produces about 8 million prompt deaths, and the counterforce-countervalue case projects 98 million prompt deaths. Partial relocation before attack to low-risk fallout areas at least 15 km from potential strategic targets would result in a decrease in projections of deaths by tens of millions. For fallout risk calculations, only the dose received in the first 48 h (the early or local fallout) is considered. Populations are assumed to be sheltered, with a shelter protection factor profile that varies for a large urban area, a small urban area, or a rural area. With these profiles, without relocation, the fallout fatalities for all four attack scenarios are calculated to be less than one million people. This can be compared to fallout fatalities of about 10 million for a hypothetical unsheltered "phantom" population.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 28
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Historical overview of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and estimates of fallout in the continental United States
    Beck, HL
    Bennettt, BG
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2002, 82 (05): : 591 - 608
  • [2] INTERNAL DOSE FOLLOWING A MAJOR NUCLEAR-WAR
    PETERSON, KR
    SHAPIRO, CS
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1992, 62 (01): : 29 - 40
  • [3] Tornado risk analysis in the United States
    Daneshvaran, Siamak
    Morden, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2007, 8 (02) : 97 - 111
  • [4] A Methodology for Calculation of Internal Dose Following Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from the Detonation of a Nuclear Fission Device
    Anspaugh, Lynn R.
    Bouville, Andre
    Thiessen, Kathleen M.
    Hoffman, F. Owen
    Beck, Harold L.
    Gordeev, Konstantin I.
    Simon, Steven L.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2022, 122 (01): : 84 - 124
  • [5] The United States Congress and nuclear war powers: explaining legislative nonfeasance
    Singh, Robert S.
    JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES, 2018, 24 (03): : 298 - 314
  • [6] Risk analysis for the importation of veterinary biologicals into the United States of America
    Roth, HJ
    Gay, CG
    Espeseth, DA
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DE L OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1995, 14 (04): : 1061 - 1072
  • [7] Risk analysis of weather-related railroad accidents in the United States
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Lin, Chen-Yu
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2025, 255
  • [8] Spatio-temporal Risk and Severity Analysis of Soybean Rust in the United States
    Bekkerman, Anton
    Goodwin, Barry K.
    Piggott, Nicholas E.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 33 (03) : 311 - 331
  • [9] Flood Risk Delineation in the United States: How Much Loss Are We Capturing?
    Blessing, Russell
    Sebastian, Antonia
    Brody, Samuel D.
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2017, 18 (03)
  • [10] Safety risk analysis of restricted-speed train accidents in the United States
    Zhang, Zhipeng
    Liu, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2020, 23 (09) : 1158 - 1176