Impact of type of donor on graft and patient survival rate in kidney transplanted patients in Iran

被引:6
作者
Ghojogh, Mousa Ghelichi [1 ]
Salarilak, Shaker [2 ]
Afshari, Ali Taghizadeh [3 ]
Khalkhali, Hamid Reza [4 ]
Mohammadi-Fallah, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Makhdoomi, Khadijeh [3 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Tabriz Branch, Publ Hlth Dept, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Imam Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Nephrol & Kidney Transplant Res Ctr, Orumiyeh, Iran
[4] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Orumiyeh, Iran
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Graft survival; Type of donor; End-stage renal disease; Living related donor;
D O I
10.15171/jrip.2018.59
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD(is an increasing problem in the world. Kidney transplant is considered as preferred therapeutic method for ESRD. Options for organ transplantation include living related donor (LRD), living unrelated donor (LURD) and cadaveric donor. Objectives: This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of type of donor on graft and survival rate of patients. Patients and Methods: This study was cross-sectional, which used Meier method to calculate the patient survival rate. Additionally log-rank test was applied to compare the survival curves; analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare continuous variables and chi(2) test was used to compare the data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 19 and P values less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean duration of follow-up in LRD, LURD and cadaveric recipients were 60.37 +/- 34.2, 79.17 +/- 33 and 61.17 +/- 34 months respectively. Five-year survival, in LRD was 100 months, in LURD recipients was 87 +/- 0.01 months, and in cadaveric recipients was 91 +/- 0.03 months. The mean survival of graft in LRD, LURD and cadaveric recipients were 115.5 +/- 3.1, 103.27 +/- 1.2 and 102.15 +/- 4.5 months, respectively. Log-rank test showed a significant difference between graft survival in recipients (P = 0.038). Conclusion: The results showed that LRD is one of the factors affecting graft survival. Hence, graft survival rate showed high length among patients who their graft was from LRD compared to LURD and cadaveric.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 268
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Living-unrelated donor renal transplantation: an alternative to living-related donor transplantation? [J].
Ahmad, Nadeem ;
Ahmed, Kamran ;
Khan, Mohammad Shamim ;
Calder, Francis ;
Mamode, Nizam ;
Taylor, John ;
Koffman, Geoff .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2008, 90 (03) :247-250
[2]  
Almasi Hashiani A, 2010, KOOMESH, V11, P302
[3]  
Bakr MA, 2005, SAUDI J KIDNEY DIS T, V16, P573
[4]   Long-term Outcome of Living Donors Older Than 60 Years [J].
Berardinelli, L. ;
Pozzoli, E. ;
Beretta, C. ;
Consonni, D. ;
Carini, M. ;
Rossini, G. ;
Scalamogna, M. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 42 (04) :1111-1113
[5]   The Effect of Donor-Recipient Relationship on Long-Term Outcomes of Living Related Donor Renal Transplantation [J].
Choi, J. Y. ;
Kwon, O. J. ;
Kang, C. M. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (01) :257-260
[6]   Living unrelated kidney transplantation [J].
Cortesini, R ;
Pretagostini, R ;
Bruzzone, P ;
Alfani, D .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 26 (02) :238-242
[7]   Iranian model of renal allograft transplantation in 3028 recipients: Survival and risk factors [J].
Einollahi, B. ;
Pourfarziani, V. ;
Ahmadzad-Asl, M. ;
Lessan-Pezeshki, M. ;
Davoudi, A. ;
Nourbala, A. ;
Shariat-Moghani, S. ;
Nemati, E. ;
Poor-Reza-Gholi, F. F. ;
Simforoosh, N. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (04) :907-910
[8]   Living Donor Transplantation: Long-Term Evolution Related to Age Matching [J].
Florit, E. A. ;
Diekmann, F. ;
Budde, K. ;
Glander, P. ;
Liefeldt, L. ;
Nistal, J. ;
Oppenheimer, F. ;
Campistol, J. M. ;
Brakemeier, S. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (08) :2346-2350
[9]   Unrelated living donors in 141 kidney transplantations - A one-center study [J].
Foss, A ;
Leivestad, T ;
Brekke, IB ;
Fauchald, P ;
Bentdal, O ;
Lien, B ;
Pfeffer, P ;
Sodal, G ;
Albrechtsen, D ;
Soreide, O ;
Flatmark, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (01) :49-52
[10]  
Fuggle SV, 2010, TRANSPLANTATION, V89, P694, DOI 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c7dc99