Everyday aesthetics and Jacques Ranciere: reconfiguring the common field of aesthetics and politics

被引:6
作者
Vihalem, Margus [1 ]
机构
[1] Tallinn Univ, Sch Humanities, Dept Philosophy, Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
Aesthetics; everyday aesthetics; politics of aesthetics; politics; Jacques Ranciere; distribution of the sensible; political aesthetics;
D O I
10.1080/20004214.2018.1506209
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Aesthetics has been a matter of politics and not only of philosophy from the very beginning. Its subversive power has for a long time been explored mostly in the context of artworks. However, it is only quite recently that the discourse of everyday aesthetics has been reaffirming the potential of aesthetics to affect the perception of the sensible. By indicating the ways that enable to redistribute the sensible, everyday aesthetics engages in going beyond the insurmountable divide between the sensuous and the intelligible, once established by Plato. The article intends to provide a theoretical basis for thinking the potential of everyday aesthetics in a political perspective. By questioning the nature of this redistribution in the Ranciere's thinking and indicating its possible configurations and applications in the present world, we intend to explore more extensively its implications for the discourse of everydays aesthetics. Is everyday aesthetics increasingly adopting a thoroughly nonmetaphysical and rather pragmatist attitude towards the ever-changing reality? Is the distribution of the sensible just another way to think the Platonic divide between the sensuous and the intelligible and their constant conflict in our experience? Is the potential of the politics to redistribute the sensible given in the emerging realm of everyday aesthetics. By exploring the connexion between politics and aesthetics, the article demonstrates the potential of Ranciere's theory for launching new explorations in the field of everyday aesthetics.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Adorno TW., 2007, AESTHETICS POLITICS
[2]  
Aristotle, 1981, POLITICS, p1279b
[3]  
Badiou Alain, 1998, PETIT MANUEL INESTHE
[4]  
Baumgarten A.G., 1988, ESTHETIQUE
[5]  
Benjamin Walter, 2002, MEDIENASTHETISCHE SC
[6]  
Bennett Jill, 2012, PRACTICAL AESTHETICS
[7]  
BERREBI S, 2008, ARTS RES, V2, P1
[8]  
Gregg M., 2010, AFFECT THEORY READER
[9]  
Hinderliter Beth, 2009, COMMUNITIES SENSE RE
[10]  
Jimenez Marc, 2005, QUERELLE ART CONT