Adult Students' Reasoning in Geometry: Teaching Mathematics through Collaborative Problem Solving in Teacher Education

被引:0
作者
Bjuland, Raymond [1 ]
机构
[1] Agder Univ Coll, Fac Math & Sci, Dept Math, Serv Boks 422, N-4602 Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
geometry; teacher education; mathematical reasoning; heuristic strategies; collaborative problem solving; dialogical approach;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
This article reports research that is concerned with pre-service teachers(2) working collaboratively in a problem-solving context without teacher involvement. The aim is to focus on the students' heuristic strategies employed in the solution process while working on two problems in geometry. Two episodes from the dialogues in one group of students with limited mathematical backgrounds have been chosen to illustrate some mathematical movement throughout the group meetings, from working with the first problem to working with the second one. The findings reveal that three categories of strategies, visualising, monitoring, and questioning, play an important role in order to make progress with the problems. As a preparation for working on the two problems, metacognitive training in combination with cooperative learning was introduced to the students throughout a month. The study indicates that these critical components in the design of the instructional context stimulated the students with limited background in mathematics to improve their problem-solving skills. The analysis has particularly focused on the important role of the process writer that provokes the mathematical discussion by generating utterances categorised as looking-back questions. By recapitulating the solution process or the last idea introduced in the dialogue, the process writer stimulated the establishment of a common ground for the further discussion. The article also deals with issues of teacher involvement in students' mathematical discussions in collaborative working groups.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EDUC STUD MATH, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10649-005-0808-X
[2]  
Barkatsas A. N., 1996, NORDISK MATEMATIKKDI, V4, P7
[3]  
Bjuland R., 1997, THESIS
[4]  
Bjuland R., 2002, THESIS
[5]  
Bjuland R., 2004, EDUC STUD MATH, V55, P199, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017690.90763.c1, DOI 10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017690.90763.C1]
[6]  
BORGERSEN HE, 2004, NORDISKMATEMATIKKDID, V9, P35
[7]  
BORGERSEN HE, 1994, NORDISK MATEMATIKKDI, V2, P6
[8]  
Brodie K., 2000, LEARNING MATH, V20, P9, DOI DOI 10.2307/40248313
[9]  
Cestari M. L., 1997, THESIS
[10]  
COBB P, 1995, EMERGENCE MATH MEANI, P25