HIRED GUNS AND MINISTERS OF JUSTICE: THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT ATTORNEYS IN THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL
被引:5
|
作者:
Asimow, Michael
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Stanford Law Sch, Law, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Law, Law Emeritus, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USAStanford Law Sch, Law, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Asimow, Michael
[1
,2
]
Dotan, Yoav
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Publ Law, Jerusalem, IsraelStanford Law Sch, Law, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
Dotan, Yoav
[3
]
机构:
[1] Stanford Law Sch, Law, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Law, Law Emeritus, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Publ Law, Jerusalem, Israel
comparative administrative law;
administrative law;
Israel;
government lawyers;
United States;
legal ethics;
D O I:
10.1017/S0021223715000254
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
What is the role of a government attorney who represents a government agency on judicial review? Most academic literature in the United States (US) advocates the 'hired gun' model in which the role of the government lawyer is no different from that of a lawyer who represents a private client (although some academics and government lawyers disagree). The prevailing view in Israel is that government lawyers are 'ministers of justice', who owe a primary obligation to the public interest rather than to the client agency. This difference is attributable both to fundamental differences in legal culture between the US and Israel as well as to unique features of the Israeli system of judicial review.