Sifting the Big Five: examining the criterion-related validity of facets

被引:3
|
作者
Darr, Wendy [1 ]
Kelloway, E. Kevin [2 ]
机构
[1] Directorate Mil Personnel Res & Anal, Dept Natl Def, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] St Marys Univ, Dept Psychol, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Personality; Task performance; Deviance; Big Five;
D O I
10.1108/JOEPP-11-2015-0038
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review organizational research on the criterion-related validity of the Big Five model of personality with a view to examine the organizational utility of facet measures of personality. Design/methodology/approach - A literature review of studies that use personality traits to predict organizational outcomes in three domains: performance (task and contextual), deviance, and interpersonal dynamics (leadership, team cohesion). Findings - The authors identify 15 specific facets drawn from the Big Five model that appear to have demonstrated criterion-related validity in the prediction of organizational outcomes. Practical implications - Results of the analysis suggest the utility of using facet-specific measures in organizational applications such as personnel selection. Originality/value - Although there is a substantial literature speaking to the validity of the Big Five traits, the study identifies specific facets that may provide a basis for more focused use of personality variables in organizations. The work also provides the basis for further measurement development of occupationally relevant personality measures.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 22
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Criterion-related validity of a Big Five general factor of personality from the TIPI to the IPIP
    Burns, Gary N.
    Morris, Megan B.
    Periard, David A.
    LaHuis, David
    Flannery, Nicholas M.
    Carretta, Thomas R.
    Roebke, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 25 (03) : 213 - 222
  • [2] The General Factor of Personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study
    van der Linden, Dimitri
    Nijenhuis, Jan Te
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2010, 44 (03) : 315 - 327
  • [3] THE FUTURE OF CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
    SCHMIDT, FL
    HUNTER, JE
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 33 (01) : 41 - 60
  • [4] Examining the criterion-related validity of the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory
    McMorris, Carly A.
    Perry, Adrienne
    AUTISM, 2015, 19 (03) : 272 - 280
  • [5] A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity
    Wefald, Andrew J.
    Mills, Maura J.
    Smith, Michael R.
    Downey, Ronald G.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2012, 4 (01) : 67 - 90
  • [6] APPROPRIATENESS FIT AND CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY
    SCHMITT, N
    CORTINA, JM
    WHITNEY, DJ
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 17 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [7] TEACHING CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY IN SOCIOLOGY
    KUNZ, PR
    FERNQUIST, RM
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (04) : 309 - 310
  • [8] CRITERION-RELATED CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY
    ROSENBAUM, PR
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1989, 54 (04) : 625 - 633
  • [9] Indirect processes in criterion-related validity
    Warr, P
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2000, 21 (07) : 731 - 745
  • [10] Examining the criterion-related validity evidence of LinkedIn profile elements in an applied sample
    Cubrich, Marc
    King, Rachel T.
    Mracek, Derek L.
    Strong, Jamie M. G.
    Hassenkamp, Kristen
    Vaughn, Daly
    Dudley, Nikki M.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 120