Scientific Output Indicators and Scientific Collaboration Network Mapping in Brazil

被引:0
|
作者
de Souza Vanz, Samile Andrea [1 ]
Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Informat Sci Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Informat Sci Dept, Commun & Informat Postgrad Program, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Co-authorship; Scientific collaboration; Brazilian Science; Brazil;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This is an investigation of Brazilian articles indexed by SCI between 2004 and 2006 with the purpose of understanding the scientific collaboration in the Brazilian community. The 49,046 articles that have been examined show that national scientific output increased every year during the period and that articles were published in a great number of journals, 15.7% of which were national publications. The most productive areas are Chemistry, Biology, Physics and Clinical and Experimental Medicine II. Authors from several institutions were identified, which indicates Brazil has yet to establish a consolidated pattern of publication, since several of the institutions contributed only one article (59.1%). Co-publication between individuals increased in the period, representing about 96% of national output. The mean number of authors per article is 6.3. Scientific output is concentrated in few institutions, mostly public universities located in specific regions. The mean number of institutions per article is 2.4, and looking into the most productive institutions, the practice of intra-institutional co-publication stood out. When relative collaboration indices and multivariate analysis were applied, regional groups proved to be formed. International co-publication decreased in percentage in the period, representing 30.3% of the total articles. The USA, France, the United Kingdom and Germany are the biggest partners in terms of articles; however, relative indices reveal the USA and Argentina are the main partners. Motivation for international collaboration seems to follow historical, linguistic and geographical proximity reasons.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 334
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bibliometric indicators of production and scientific collaboration of the Pontifical Catholic University of Brazil
    Yanai, Angela Emi
    de Souza, Claudia Daniele
    de Oliveira, Meire Ramalho
    de Oliveira, Maria Fernanda
    BIBLIOS-REVISTA DE BIBLIOTECOLOGIA Y CIENCIAS DE LA INFORMACION, 2020, (79): : 1 - 14
  • [2] Mapping the research on scientific collaboration
    HOU Jianhua
    CHEN Chaomei
    YAN Jianxin
    Journal of Data and Information Science, 2010, 3 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [3] Scientific collaboration in the areas of information in Brazil (1972-2013)
    Vilan Filho, Jayme Leiro
    REVISTA IBERO-AMERICANA DE CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2016, 9 (01): : 258 - 270
  • [4] Scientific collaboration: theoretical and conceptual review
    de Souza Vanz, Samile Andrea
    Chitto Stumpf, Ida Regina
    PERSPECTIVAS EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2010, 15 (02): : 42 - 55
  • [5] Collaboration Networks in the Brazilian Scientific Output in Evolutionary Biology: 2000-2012
    Santin, Dirce M.
    Vanz, Samile A. S.
    Stumpf, Ida R. C.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2016, 88 (01): : 165 - 178
  • [6] Scientific collaboration network evolution model
    Yang, Hong-yong
    Zhu, Xun-lin
    General System and Control System, Vol I, 2007, : 15 - 17
  • [7] Scientific collaboration network analysis on biogas
    Matos Guimaraes, Claudio Marcelo
    Galvao, Viviane
    PERSPECTIVAS EM CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2015, 20 (02): : 120 - 133
  • [8] Analysis of scientific collaboration network of Italian Institute of Technology
    di Bella, Enrico
    Gandullia, Luca
    Preti, Sara
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (10) : 8517 - 8539
  • [9] Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration
    Prathap, Gangan
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2013, 95 (02) : 563 - 570
  • [10] Second order indicators for evaluating international scientific collaboration
    Gangan Prathap
    Scientometrics, 2013, 95 : 563 - 570