Validity of The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations - Short Form (CISS-21) in a Non-Clinical Turkish Sample

被引:19
|
作者
Boysan, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Yuzuncu Univ, Sch Literature, Dept Psychiat, 65080 Kampus, Van, Turkey
关键词
Coping; assessment; confirmatory factor analysis; validity; reliability;
D O I
10.5350/DAJPN2012250201
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Validity of the Coping Inventory For Stressful Situations - Short Form (CISS-21) in a non-clinical Turkish sample Objective: The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) is a promising psychometric instrument with sound psychometric properties. In this study, we aimed to examine psychometric properties of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations-Short Form (CISS-21) in a relatively large Turkish college sample. Method: 978 undergraduates participated in the study. Mean age of the sample was 20.33 (SD +/- 3.17). 33.33 percent of the sample were males (n=326). In the study, the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations-Short Form (CISS-21), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWSL) were administered. To explore the validity of the psychometric instrument, confirmatory factor analysis and Pearson's correlations of subscales with psychological variables were computed. Later, internal consistency and test-retest correlations between two applications were obtained 15-day apart to evaluate reliability of the instrument. Results: In the confirmatory factor analysis, three-factor structure model generated root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) value of 0.07, comparative fit index (CFI) value of 0.91, incremental fit index (IFI) value of 0.91, a non-normed fit index (NNFI) value of 0.90, and SMSR value of 0.08. Confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence for the validity of three-factor structure in Turkish sample. Internal consistency estimates for the three dimensions of the scale were as follows: for the Task-oriented coping, alpha=0.72; for the Emotion-oriented coping, alpha= 0.77; and for the Avoidance-oriented coping, a= 0.74. 15-day test-retest correlations for the sub-scales were as follows: for the Task-oriented coping, r=0.79; for the Emotion-oriented coping, r=0.75; and for the Avoidance-oriented coping, r=0.66. Positive affect was significantly associated with Task-oriented coping (r=0.36) and negative affect was significantly associated with Emotion-oriented coping (r=0.44). Conclusion: Confirmatory factor analysis solution replicated the original three-factor structure of the CISS-21 in Turkish college sample. The scale is a valid and reliable instrument to be used in research purposes among Turkish sample.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] A dapting the short form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations into Chinese
    Li, Chun
    Liu, Qing
    Hu, Ti
    Jin, Xiaoyan
    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT, 2017, 13 : 1669 - 1675
  • [2] Re-examining psychometric properties of the Turkish form of the Guilt Inventory in a non-clinical and depression sample
    Akyn, Burcin
    Hacyomeroglu, Bikem
    Inozu, Mujgan
    KLINIK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 21 (01): : 24 - 37
  • [3] Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) in a Non-Clinical Sample
    Gulec, Mustafa
    Kalafat, Temel
    Boysan, Murat
    Barut, Yasar
    NOROPSIKIYATRI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2013, 50 (02): : 147 - 153
  • [4] Psychometric properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) and its short-form (GAI-SF) in a clinical and non-clinical sample of older adults
    Johnco, Carly
    Knight, Ashleigh
    Tadic, Dusanka
    Wuthrich, Viviana M.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 (07) : 1089 - 1097
  • [5] Validity of the French form of the somatosensory amplification scale in a non-clinical sample
    Bridou, Morgiane
    Aguerre, Colette
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH, 2013, 1 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [6] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory - Revised in a Non-clinical Sample
    Lim, Joon Suk
    Kim, Se Joo
    Jeon, Woo Taek
    Cha, Kyung Ryul
    Park, Joon Hyung
    Kim, Chan-Hyung
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 49 (06) : 909 - 916
  • [7] Validity and Reliability of the Affective Lability Scale-18 (ALS-18) Turkish Form in the Non-Clinical Group
    Dodan, Veysel
    Senormanci, Smer
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2024,
  • [8] Validity and reliability of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form in Indonesian non-clinical population
    Danasasmita, Febrianti Santiardi
    Pandia, Veranita
    Fitriana, Efi
    Afriandi, Irvan
    Purba, Fredrick Dermawan
    Ichsan, Abdullah
    Pradana, Kent
    Santoso, Alfonso Haris Setia
    Mardhiyah, Fithriani Salma
    Engellia, Rita
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [9] Full and Short Versions of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations and Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised: Examining Their Factor Structure in a Dutch Outpatient Sex Offender Sample
    van Horn, J. E.
    Wilpert, J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2017, 120 (04) : 739 - 759