METABOLIC COMPARTMENTATION OF VERTEBRATE GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE - PUTATIVE MITOCHONDRIAL TARGETING SIGNAL IN AVIAN LIVER GLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASE

The evolution of uricoteley as a mechanism for hepatic ammonia detoxication in vertebrates required targeting of glutamine synthetase (GS) to liver mitochondria in the sauropsid line of descent leading to the squamate reptiles and archosaurs. Previous studies have shown that in birds and crocodilians, sole survivors of the archosaurian line, hepatic GS is translated without a transient, N-terminal targeting signal common to other mitochondrial matrix proteins. To identify a putative internal targeting sequence in the avian enzyme, the amino acid sequence of chicken liver GS was derived by a combination of sequencing of cloned cDNA, direct sequencing of mRNA, and sequencing of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products amplified from reverse-transcribed mRNA. Analysis of the first 20 or so N-terminal amino acids of the derived sequence for the chicken enzyme shows that they are devoid of acidic amino acids, contain several hydroxy amino acids, and can be predicted to form a positively charged, amphipathic helix, all of which are characteristic properties of mitochondrial targeting signals. A comparison of the N-terminus of chicken GS with the N-termini of cytosolic mammalian GSs indicates that at least three amino acid replacements may have been responsible for converting the N-terminus of the cytosolic mammalian enzyme into a mitochondrial targeting signal. Two of these, His15 and Lys19, result in additional positive charges, as well as in changes in hydrophilicity. Both could have resulted from third-base-codon substitutions. A third replacement, Ala12, may contribute to the helicity of the N-terminus of the chicken enzyme. The N-terminus of the cytosolic chicken brain GS (positions 1-36) was found to be identical to that of the liver enzyme. The complete sequence of chicken retinal GS is also identical to that of the liver enzyme. GS is coded by a single gene in birds, so these sequence data suggest that, unlike the situation in other tissue-specific compartmental isozymes, differential targeting of avian GS to the mitochondrial or cytosolic compartments is not dependent on the sequence of the primary translation product of its mRNA but may involve some other tissue-specific factor(s).