A Comparative Study on Performance of Two Aerobic Sequencing Batch Reactors with Flocculated and Granulated Sludge Treating an Industrial Estate Wastewater: Process Analysis and Modeling

被引:11
作者
Asadi, A. [1 ]
Zinatizadeh, A. A. L. [1 ]
Sumathi, S. [2 ]
Rezaie, N. [3 ]
Kiani, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] RaziUniv, Water & Wastewater Res Ctr, Dept Appl Chem, Fac Chem, Kermanshah, Iran
[2] Univ Tunku Abdul Rahman, Dept Environm Engn, Fac Engn & Green Technol, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Razi Univ, Dept Organ Chem, Fac Chem, Kermanshah, Iran
[4] Water & Power Ind Inst Appl & Sci Higher Educ, Water & Environm Div, Kermanshah, Iran
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING | 2013年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
Simultaneous Carbon and Nutrients Removal; Granulated and Flocculated Sludge; Sequencing Batch Reactor; Faraman's Industrial Wastewater;
D O I
10.5829/idosi.ije.2013.26.02b.01
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, the performance of two aerobic sequencing batch reactors (SBR) in removing carbon and nutrient (N & P) from Faraman's industrial estate wastewater (FIW) with flocculated and granulated sludge was compared. The comparison study was performed by varying two significant independent variables (aeration time and mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS)). The experiments were conducted based on a central composite design (CCD) and analyzed using response surface methodology (RSM). The region of exploration for the process was taken as the area enclosed by aeration time (6-24 h) and MLVSS (2000-7000 mg/L) boundaries. The results showed that the granulated sludge system was more efficient than the flocculated sludge system in removing the non-biodegradable COD (nbCOD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and other sludge studied characteristics. The performance of both systems was almost the same for COD removal in FIW with a maximum removal of about 70 %.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 116
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Aerobic granular sludge: Recent advances
    Adav, Sunil S.
    Lee, Duu-Jong
    Show, Kuan-Yeow
    Tay, Joo-Hwa
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2008, 26 (05) : 411 - 423
  • [2] Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of municipal landfill leachate in sequential two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) systems
    Agdag, ON
    Sponza, DT
    [J]. PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 40 (02) : 895 - 902
  • [3] Combined and separate aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of green olive debittering wastewater
    Aggelis, GG
    Gavala, HN
    Lyberatos, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (03): : 283 - 292
  • [4] APHA-American Public Health Association, 1999, AM PUBLIC HLTH ASS A, Vtwentieth
  • [5] Aerobic granulation with industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactors
    Arrojo, B
    Mosquera-Corral, A
    Garrido, JM
    Méndez, R
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (14-15) : 3389 - 3399
  • [6] Performance of intermittently aerated up-flow sludge bed reactor and sequencing batch reactor treating industrial estate wastewater: A comparative study
    Asadi, A.
    Zinatizadeh, A. A. L.
    Isa, M. Hasnain
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 123 : 495 - 506
  • [7] Simultaneous removal of carbon and nutrients from an industrial estate wastewater in a single up-flow aerobic/anoxic sludge bed (UAASB) bioreactor
    Asadi, A.
    Zinatizadeh, A. A. L.
    Sumathi, S.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (15) : 4587 - 4598
  • [8] Geochemical Characterization of Organic Pollutants in Effluents Discharged from Various Industrial Sources to Riverine Systems
    Botalova, Oxana
    Schwarzbauer, Jan
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2011, 221 (1-4) : 77 - 98
  • [9] A review on anaerobic-aerobic treatment of industrial and municipal wastewater
    Chan, Yi Jing
    Chong, Mei Fong
    Law, Chung Lim
    Hassell, D. G.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2009, 155 (1-2) : 1 - 18
  • [10] Operational strategies for nitrogen removal in granular sequencing batch reactor
    Chen, Fang-yuan
    Liu, Yong-Qiang
    Tay, Joo-Hwa
    Ning, Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 189 (1-2) : 342 - 348