WILLINGNESS TO PERFORM EUTHANASIA - A SURVEY OF PHYSICIAN ATTITUDES

被引:78
作者
SHAPIRO, RS
DERSE, AR
GOTTLIEB, M
SCHIEDERMAYER, D
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT FAMILY MED,MILWAUKEE,WI
[2] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT MED,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.154.5.575
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In the United States, few studies have examined important variables in physician attitudes toward the practice of euthanasia, such as the patient's underlying disease, mental capacity, and age, and the physician's specialty and religion. We administered a case-based survey to analyze the impact of such specific variables on physician attitudes toward the practice. Methods: A four-section survey solicited (1) physician responses to three hypothetical cases in which patients requested euthanasia; (2) physicians' general opinions about euthanasia and how its legalization might affect them personally and professionally; and (3) demographic information. Analysis focused on physicians' characteristics as they related to their responses to the various aspects of euthanasia elicited in the survey. Univariate and multivariate analyses, using logistic regression, were performed. Results: Completed and analyzable surveys were returned by 740 physicians. We found that physicians felt more comfortable with euthanasia requests from non-decisional, nonterminal patients who had left advance directives than they did with requests from decisional patients suffering from grave illnesses or injuries, or from decisional patients who had early signs of a progressive but nonlethal neurologic disease. We also found that physicians' specialties and religions correlated with their responses to the hypothetical cases and with their generalized attitudes toward euthanasia. Conclusions: Given the disparity in responding physicians' attitudes toward euthanasia, along with the fact that values based on religious affiliation Or profession may underlie many physicians' opposition to the practice, we conclude that if euthanasia is to be legalized, safeguards protective of patients and physicians must be incorporated.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 584
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   TUTORIAL ON MODELING ORDERED CATEGORICAL RESPONSE DATA [J].
AGRESTI, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (02) :290-301
[2]   EUTHANASIA [J].
ANGELL, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (20) :1348-1350
[3]   EUTHANASIA - THE NEED FOR PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS [J].
BENRUBI, GI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (03) :197-199
[4]  
BLEICH JD, 1981, JUDAISM HEALING
[5]   SHOULD PHYSICIANS AID THEIR PATIENTS IN DYING - THE PUBLIC PERSPECTIVE [J].
BLENDON, RJ ;
SZALAY, US ;
KNOX, RA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (19) :2658-2662
[6]   MORALS AND MORALISM IN THE DEBATE OVER EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE [J].
CASSEL, CK ;
MEIER, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 323 (11) :750-752
[7]   LIMITS OF PATIENT AUTONOMY - PHYSICIAN ATTITUDES AND PRACTICES REGARDING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS AND EUTHANASIA [J].
FRIED, TR ;
STEIN, MD ;
OSULLIVAN, PS ;
BROCK, DW ;
NOVACK, DH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 153 (06) :722-728
[8]  
Hosmer DW, 1989, APPLIED LOGISTIC REG
[9]  
Jakobovitz I., 1975, JEWISH MED ETHICS
[10]  
JONSEN AR, 1988, WESTERN J MED, V149, P195