Seismic vulnerability assessment for Montreal

被引:16
|
作者
Yu, Keyan [1 ]
Chouinard, Luc E. [2 ]
Rosset, Philippe [3 ]
机构
[1] SNC Lavalin, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Appl Mech, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] EIM, Les Gets, France
关键词
Seismic risk analysis; epistemic uncertainty; uncertainty propagation; Montreal;
D O I
10.1080/17499518.2015.1106562
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In Canada, Montreal is the second city with the highest seismic risk. This is due to its relatively high seismic hazard, old infrastructures and high population density. The region is characterised by moderate seismic activity with no recent record of a major earthquake. The lack of historical strong ground motion records for the region contributes to large uncertainties in the estimation of hazards. Among the sources of uncertainty, the attenuation function is the main contributor and its effect on estimates of risks is investigated. Epistemic uncertainty was considered by obtaining damage estimates for three attenuation functions that were developed for Eastern North America. The results indicate that loss estimates are highly sensitive to the choice of the attenuation function and suggest that epistemic uncertainty should be considered both for the definition of the hazard function and in loss estimation methodologies. Seismic loss estimates are performed for a 2% in 50 years seismic threat, which corresponds to the design level earthquake in the national building code of Canada, using HAZUS-MH4 for the Montreal region over 522 census tracts. The study estimated that for the average scenario roughly 5% of the building stock would be damaged with direct economic losses evaluated at 1.4 billion dollars for such a scenario. The maximum number of casualties would result in approximately 500 people being injured or dead at a calculated time of occurrence of 2 pm.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 178
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic nonstructural vulnerability assessment in school buildings
    Alessandra De Angelis
    Marisa Pecce
    Natural Hazards, 2015, 79 : 1333 - 1358
  • [22] Seismic vulnerability assessment of a monumental masonry building
    Castori, Giulio
    Borri, Antonio
    De Maria, Alessandro
    Corradi, Marco
    Sisti, Romina
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 136 : 454 - 465
  • [23] Seismic nonstructural vulnerability assessment in school buildings
    De Angelis, Alessandra
    Pecce, Marisa
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (02) : 1333 - 1358
  • [24] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Monumental Masonry Building
    De Angelis, Alessandra
    Maddaloni, Giuseppe
    Pecce, Maria Rosaria
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2020, 5 (11) : 1 - 15
  • [25] Seismic vulnerability assessment of a historical building in Tunisia
    Ei-Borgi, S.
    Choura, S.
    Neifar, M.
    Smaoui, H.
    Majdoub, M. S.
    Cherif, D.
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2008, 4 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [26] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Modular Steel Buildings
    Annan, C. D.
    Youssef, M. A.
    El Naggar, M. H.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2009, 13 (08) : 1065 - 1088
  • [27] Punctual assessment of the seismic vulnerability of the urban building
    Corradi, Jun
    Salvucci, Gianluigi
    Vitale, Valerio
    GEOMEDIA, 2014, 18 (02) : 334 - 340
  • [28] Assessment of the seismic vulnerability of traditional Bhutanese buildings
    Ilharco, T.
    Costa, A. A.
    Guedes, J. M.
    da Silva, B. Quelhas
    Lopes, V
    Vasconcelos, J. L.
    Vasconcelos, G.
    BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY: TRENDS, INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES, 2016, : 835 - 842
  • [29] Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings in Karachi
    Mohammad A.F.
    Khan R.A.
    Fatima E.B.
    Shaukat E.A.
    Mujtaba E.M.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 24 (1) : 137 - 151
  • [30] Assessment of the seismic vulnerability of unreinforced masonry buildings
    Penelis, GG
    Kappos, AJ
    Stylianidis, KC
    STRUCTURAL STUDIES, REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE OF HERITAGE ARCHITECTURE VIII, 2003, 16 : 575 - 584