Safety and continuity of second- and third-line therapy with paclitaxel or irinotecan for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Kimura, Michio [1 ]
Usami, Eiseki [1 ]
Kanematsu, Tetsufumi [2 ]
Iwai, Mina [1 ]
Yoshimura, Tomoaki [1 ]
Mori, Hiromi [1 ]
Sugiyama, Tadashi [3 ]
Teramachi, Hitomi [4 ]
机构
[1] Ogaki Municipal Hosp, Dept Pharm, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu 5038502, Japan
[2] Gifu Social Insurance Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kani, Gifu 5090206, Japan
[3] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Pharm Practice & Social Sci, Gifu 5011196, Japan
[4] Gifu Pharmaceut Univ, Lab Clin Pharm, Gifu 5011196, Japan
关键词
safety; continuity; paclitaxel; irinotecan; gastric cancer;
D O I
10.3892/mco.2014.260
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer, the prolongation of survival depends on the use of second-line therapy, with paclitaxel (PTX) or irinotecan (CPT-11) as the key agents. The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety and continuity of weekly PTX and CPT-11 monotherapy as second- or third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. A total of 62 patients who had received PTX or CPT-11 for gastric cancer at the Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 47 patients who received PTX as second-line therapy, 13 (27.7%) received third-line therapy with CPT-11. Second-line PTX and third-line CPT-11 were discontinued due to progressive disease (PD) in 27 and 7 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the performance status (PS) in 20 and 4 cases, respectively. Only 1 case of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) was reported for third-line CPT-11. Furthermore, of the 15 patients who received CPT-11 as second-line treatment, 11 (73.3%) then received PTX as third-line treatment. Second-line CPT-11 and third-line PTX were discontinued due to PD in 9 and 6 cases, respectively, and deterioration in the PS in 4 and 5 cases, respectively, whereas there was only 1 case of discontinuation due to AEs for second-line CPT-11. Severe AEs for PTX and CPT-11 were infrequent; however, the frequency of diarrhea was high when PTX was administered as third-line therapy (63.6%), whereas the frequency of malaise was high when CPT-11 was administered as second-(73.3%) and third-line (76.9%) therapy. In conclusion, severe AEs due to PTX and CPT-11 as second-and third-line treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer are infrequent and patients are generally able to continue treatment. However, the possibility of diarrhea with third-line PTX and malaise with second- and third-line CPT-11 treatment should be considered when planning chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 472
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Weekly Paclitaxel as Second-line Chemotherapy in Japanese Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Kadokura, Makoto
    Iwasa, Satoru
    Honma, Yoshitaka
    Kato, Ken
    Hamaguchi, Tetsuya
    Yamada, Yasuhide
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Shimada, Yasuhiro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (10) : 4547 - 4552
  • [22] Cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a single centre phase II trial
    Vincenzi, B
    Santini, D
    Rabitti, C
    Coppola, R
    Zobel, BB
    Trodella, L
    Tonini, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 94 (06) : 792 - 797
  • [23] Cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients: a single centre phase II trial
    B Vincenzi
    D Santini
    C Rabitti
    R Coppola
    B Beomonte Zobel
    L Trodella
    G Tonini
    British Journal of Cancer, 2006, 94 : 792 - 797
  • [24] Is cetuximab in combination with irinotecan as a third-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer scientifically justified?
    Krakowska, Magdalena
    Czyzykowski, Rafal
    Potemski, Piotr
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (06): : 205 - 208
  • [25] Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil
    Pfeiffer, P.
    Nielsen, D.
    Bjerregaard, J.
    Qvortrup, C.
    Yilmaz, M.
    Jensen, B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) : 1141 - 1145
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with or without targeted therapy as second-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer A meta-analysis
    Zheng, Ting
    Jin, Jianjiang
    Zhang, Yuefeng
    Zhou, Li
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (25) : E20734
  • [27] Phase II study on the combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin as a second-line therapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer
    Rino, Yasushi
    Yukawa, Norio
    Sato, Tsutomu
    Oshima, Takashi
    Tanabe, Hiroyasu
    Yamamoto, Yuji
    Matsukawa, Hiroshi
    Shiraishi, Ryuji
    Imada, Toshio
    Masuda, Munetaka
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 1 (04) : 749 - 752
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of cetuximab plus FOLFOX in second-line and third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Ozaslan, Ersin
    Topaloglu, Ulas Serkan
    Inanc, Mevlude
    Erdem, Umut Gokmen
    Demir, Hacer
    Arpaci, Erkan
    Seker, Mehmet Metin
    Karaaga, Mustafa
    Kiziltepe, Melih
    Eker, Baki
    Ozkan, Metin
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2017, 22 (04): : 863 - 868
  • [29] Third-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yu
    Zhu, Xu-Qing
    Ren, Xiao-Gang
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (24)
  • [30] A phase I/II trial of second-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and irinotecan in fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer
    Kim, Jin Won
    Choi, In Sil
    Kim, Yu Jung
    Lee, Kyung-Hun
    Lee, Keun-Wook
    Kim, Tae-Yong
    Han, Sae-Won
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Kim, Tae-You
    Lee, Jong Seok
    Bang, Yung-Jue
    Im, Seock-Ah
    Oh, Do-Youn
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 75 (06) : 1175 - 1182