DISSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR AND CYTOPLASMIC CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION BY DRUGS EMPLOYED IN CELL SYNCHRONIZATION

被引:78
|
作者
URBANI, L [1 ]
SHERWOOD, SW [1 ]
SCHIMKE, RT [1 ]
机构
[1] STANFORD UNIV, DEPT BIOL SCI, STANFORD, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/excr.1995.1216
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We have studied the effect of the cell synchronization agents compactin, ciclopirox olamine, mimosine, aphidicolin, ALLN, and colcemid on several parameters of cell cycle progression in mitotically synchronized HeLa S3 cells. Using cell size and cyclin A and B levels as markers of cytoplasmic progression and DNA content as a measure of nuclear cell cycle position, we have examined coordination of cytoplasmic and nuclear events during induction synchrony. Each synchronizing agent was unique in its effect on the coordination of the cytoplasmic and nuclear cycle. Mimosine, aphidicolin, ALLN, and colcemid disrupted cell cycle integration while compactin and ciclopirox olamine did not, Continued net cell growth during cell cycle arrest was the most dramatic in aphidicolin-treated cells, which averaged a 60% increase in size. Mimosine, ALLN, and colcemid produced an increase in cell size of approximately 25%, and ciclopyrox olamine and compactin exerted a negligible effect. Cyclin A and B were found at mitotic (high) or G1 (low) levels, or in combination of high and low concentrations not correlated with DNA content in drug-treated cells. For example, treatment with mimosine, which arrests cells in G1 with 2C DNA, resulted in cyclin A accumulating to mitotic levels, whereas cyclin B remained at a low concentration, the first time this phenomenon has been observed. These results demonstrate that populations of synchronized cells obtained by different drug treatments are blocked at biochemically distinct cell cycle points not apparent by cytometric measurement of DNA content. Our results provide conclusive evidence that induced synchrony methods differ with respect to their impact on cell cycle organization and from the pattern seen with nonperturbing cell selection methods. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nuclear envelope influences on cell-cycle progression
    Srsen, Vlastimil
    Korfali, Nadia
    Schirmer, Eric C.
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2011, 39 : 1742 - 1746
  • [2] ELEVATED PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN LEVELS IN IMMATURE THYMOCYTES - DISSOCIATION FROM CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION
    TURKA, LA
    GRATIOTDEANS, J
    KEIM, D
    BANDUKWALA, R
    GREEN, J
    STRAHLER, J
    HANASH, SM
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 150 (07) : 2746 - 2752
  • [3] CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR PROTEIN-KINASES DURING CELL-CYCLE
    COSTA, M
    FULLER, DJM
    RUSSELL, DH
    GERNER, EW
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA, 1977, 479 (04) : 416 - 426
  • [4] CALMODULIN AND THE CELL-CYCLE - INVOLVEMENT IN REGULATION OF CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION
    CHAFOULEAS, JG
    BOLTON, WE
    HIDAKA, H
    BOYD, AE
    MEANS, AR
    CELL, 1982, 28 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [5] SYNCHRONIZATION OF THE CELL-CYCLE IN YEAST BY HYDROXYUREA
    JIRKU, V
    HASEK, J
    PACA, J
    SBORNIK VYSOKE SKOLY CHEMICKO-TECHNOLOGICKE V PRAZE-POTRAVINY, 1981, E51 : 123 - 131
  • [6] ON THE POSSIBLE MECHANISM OF CELL-CYCLE SYNCHRONIZATION
    POLEZHAEV, AA
    VOLKOV, EI
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1981, 41 (02) : 81 - 89
  • [7] A map of protein dynamics during cell-cycle progression and cell-cycle exit
    Gookin, Sara
    Min, Mingwei
    Phadke, Harsha
    Chung, Mingyu
    Moser, Justin
    Miller, Iain
    Carter, Dylan
    Spencer, Sabrina L.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (09)
  • [8] CYTOPLASMIC PH AND THE REGULATION OF THE DICTYOSTELIUM CELL-CYCLE
    AERTS, RJ
    DURSTON, AJ
    MOOLENAAR, WH
    CELL, 1985, 43 (03) : 653 - 657
  • [9] EFFECT OF ADRIAMYCIN ON CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION
    KIMLER, BF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, 1976, 17 (MAR): : 74 - 74
  • [10] EFFECTS OF CHARTREUSIN ON CELL SURVIVAL AND CELL-CYCLE PROGRESSION
    BHUYAN, BK
    ROBINSON, MI
    SHUGARS, KD
    BONO, VH
    DION, RL
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1978, 38 (09) : 2734 - 2739