PLANT-RESPONSE TO ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY

被引:189
作者
GRANTZ, DA
机构
[1] United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Experiment Station Hspa, Aiea, Hawaii, 96701
关键词
cuticle; humidity; sensory transduction; stomata; transpiration; vapour pressure difference; water use;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01082.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Abstract. Plants growing in environments differing in prevailing humidity exhibit variations in traits associated with regulation of water loss, particularly cuticular and stomatal properties. Expansive growth is also typically reduced by low humidity. Nevertheless, there is little evidence in plants for a specific sensor for humidity, analogous to the blue light or phytochrome photoreceptors. The detailed mechanism of the stomatal response to humidity remains unknown. Available data suggest mediation by fluxes of water vapour, with evaporation rate assuming the role of sensor. This implies that stomata respond to the driving force for diffusional water loss, leaf‐air vapour pressure difference. Induction of metabolic stomatal response to humidity may involve signal metabolites, such as abscisic acid, that are present in the transpiration stream. These materials may accumulate in the vicinity of guard cells according to the magnitude and location of cuticular transpiration, both of which could change with humidity. Such a mechanism remains hypothetical, but is suggested to account for feedforward responses in which transpiration decreases with increasing evaporative demand, and for the apparent insensitivity of stomatal aperture in isolated epidermis to epidermal water status. Other responses of plants to humidity may involve similar indirect response mechanisms, in the absence of specific humidity sensors. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 679
页数:13
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
ALTNER H, 1985, ANNU REV ENTOMOL, V30, P273, DOI 10.1146/annurev.en.30.010185.001421
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, PROG PHOTOSYNTH RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48
[3]   THE STRUCTURE AND ORIENTATION OF GUARD-CELLS IN PLANTS SHOWING STOMATAL RESPONSES TO CHANGING VAPOR-PRESSURE DIFFERENCE [J].
APPLEBY, RF ;
DAVIES, WJ .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1983, 52 (04) :459-468
[4]   A POSSIBLE EVAPORATION SITE IN THE GUARD-CELL WALL AND THE INFLUENCE OF LEAF STRUCTURE ON THE HUMIDITY RESPONSE BY STOMATA OF WOODY-PLANTS [J].
APPLEBY, RF ;
DAVIES, WJ .
OECOLOGIA, 1983, 56 (01) :30-40
[5]   THE MAGNITUDE OF THE STOMATAL RESPONSE TO BLUE-LIGHT - MODULATION BY ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY [J].
ASSMANN, SM ;
GRANTZ, DA .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 93 (02) :701-709
[6]  
ASSMANN SM, 1990, JPLANT CELL ENVV, V13, P163
[7]   INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT ON LEAF WAX DEVELOPMENT IN BRASSICA-OLERACEA VAR GEMMIFERA [J].
BAKER, EA .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1974, 73 (05) :955-+
[8]  
Ball J. T., 1987, Stomatal function, P445
[9]   MOVEMENT AND COMPARTMENTATION OF ABSCISIC-ACID IN GUARD-CELLS OF VALERIANELLA-LOCUSTA - EFFECTS OF OSMOTIC-STRESS, EXTERNAL H+-CONCENTRATION AND FUSICOCCIN [J].
BEHL, R ;
HARTUNG, W .
PLANTA, 1986, 168 (03) :360-368
[10]   ROOT TO SHOOT COMMUNICATION IN MAIZE PLANTS OF THE EFFECTS OF SOIL DRYING [J].
BLACKMAN, PG ;
DAVIES, WJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1985, 36 (162) :39-48