Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo- liberal era

被引:150
作者
Alejandro Leal, Pablo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Benito Juarez Oaxaca, Avenida Univ S-N Ex Hacienda 5 Senores, Oaxaca 68120, Mexico
关键词
Civil Society; Rights; Aid; Methods;
D O I
10.1080/09614520701469518
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Participation was originally conceived as part of a counter-hegemonic approach to radical social transformation and, as such, represented a challenge to the status quo. Paradoxically, throughout the 1980s and 1990s, ` participation' gained legitimacy within the institutional development world to the extent of achieving buzzword status. The precise manipulations required to convert a radical proposal into something that could serve the neo- liberal world order led to participation's political decapitation. Reduced to a series of methodological packages and techniques, participation would slowly lose its philosophical and ideological meaning. In order to make the approach and methodology serve counter-hegemonic processes of grassroots resistance and transformation, these meanings desperately need to be recovered. This calls for participation to be re-articulated within broader processes of social and political struggle in order to facilitate the recovery of social transformation in the world of twenty- first century capitalism.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 548
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Freire Paulo, 1978, PEDAGOGY PROCESS LET
[12]  
Galeano Eduardo, 2002, JORNADA MEXICO 1019
[13]  
Guijt I., 1998, MYTH COMMUNITY
[14]  
Hall Budd L., 1997, MIDW RES PRACT C AD
[15]  
Hammond John, 1988, FIGHTING LEARN POPUL
[16]  
LEAL P, 1999, PARTICIPATION DEV AG
[17]  
Mohan G., 2004, TYRANNY TRANSFORMATI
[18]  
Moore David B., 1995, DEBATING DEV DISCOUR
[19]  
Narayan D., 2000, VOICES POOR CAN ANYO
[20]   DILEMMAS OF DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE - THE CRISIS OF DEVELOPMENTALISM AND THE COMPARATIVE METHOD [J].
PIETERSE, JN .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1991, 22 (01) :5-29