SUPERIOR RESULTS OF ILEOANAL PULLTHROUGH (IAPT) IN POLYPOSIS-COLI VS ULCERATIVE-COLITIS PATIENTS

Colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal pullthrough (IAPT) have replaced proctocolectomy as the operation of choice in most patients with the colorectal mucosal diseases ulcerative colitis and polyposis coli. This study was conducted to determine whether there is any difference in postoperative morbidity and long-term functional results when IAPT is performed for polyposis coli than when it is performed for ulcerative colitis patients. Between 1982 and 1989, 277 IAPT procedures were performed at the University of Utah Medical Center, 239 for ulcerative colitis and 38 for polyposis coli syndromes. A prospective study compared polyposis and colitis patients after IAPT with regards to age, family history, preoperative findings, operative findings, postoperative complications, and long-term complications. Functional results were compared including day and night stool frequency, incidence of nighttime incontinence, and incidence of pouchitis. The incidence of postoperative complications was lower in the polyposis group than in the colitis group, but the numbers were low enough in both diseases that significant differences were not detected. However, the incidence of pouchitis (0% vs 19%), day (4.2 vs 6.0) and night (0.4 vs 0.9) stool frequency, and nighttime incontinence (5% vs 25%) was significantly lower in the polyposis group when compared to the colitis group. We conclude that IAPT performed for polyposis conditions is associated with superior results when compared with results from patients who undergo the procedure for ulcerative colitis. © 1992.