Treatment effects of Forsus fatigue resistant device on class II malocclusion cases: A cephalometric evaluation

被引:4
作者
Dada, Doa M. [1 ]
Galang-Boquiren, Maria Therese [1 ]
Viana, Grace [1 ]
Obrez, Ales [2 ]
Kusnoto, Budi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Dent, Dept Orthodont, 801 South Paulina St,Room 131, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Cephalometrics; Class II malocclusion; Fixed functional appliances; Forsus; Forsus fatigue-resistant device;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejwf.2014.11.004
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to evaluate dental and skeletal changes after a comprehensive orthodontic treatment protocol involving the use of Forsus fatigue-resistant device. Methods: Pre- and post-treatment cephalometric radiographs of 19 subjects (mean age 12 +/- 1.22 years) treated with the Forsus device were selected based on several criteria, including, but not limited to ANB and Angle molar classification. Treatment group records were evaluated, matched, and compared to an untreated control group. The control group's lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained from the archives of a longitudinal growth study. The Student's t test was used, with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in ANB angle; SNA angle; and angle of convexity. Mandibular incisors showed significant proclination. The maxillary first molar showed no significant intrusion or distal movement. Conclusions: Based on the treatment protocol used in this study, Class II malocclusion correction was achieved mainly by dental changes in the mandible in the form of mandibular incisor proclination and some skeletal changes in the maxilla. Whether the changes in the maxilla were true skeletal changes remains to be verified. (C) 2015 World Federation of Orthodontists.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 17
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] 3M Unitek, 2013, FORS FAT RES DEV
  • [2] Aelbers CMF, 1996, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V110, P513
  • [3] Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: A cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study
    Aras, Aynur
    Ada, Emel
    Saracoglu, Hatice
    Gezer, Naciye S.
    Aras, Isil
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (05) : 616 - 625
  • [4] Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage
    Aslan, Belma I.
    Kucukkaraca, Ebru
    Turkoz, Cagri
    Dincer, Mufide
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2014, 84 (01) : 76 - 87
  • [5] Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Barnett, Gregory A.
    Higgins, Duncan W.
    Major, Paul W.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (02) : 361 - 369
  • [6] Does proclination of maxillary incisors really affect the sagittal position of point A?
    Bicakci, Ali Altug
    Cankaya, Ozkan Semih
    Mertoglu, Serhat
    Yilmaz, Nurbengu
    Altan, Burcu Kocoglu
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (06) : 943 - 947
  • [7] FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES - A REVIEW
    BISHARA, SE
    ZIAJA, RR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1989, 95 (03) : 250 - 258
  • [8] Retention and stability: A review of the literature
    Blake, M
    Bibby, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [9] Covell DA, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P311
  • [10] AN INVESTIGATION OF MAXILLARY SUPERIMPOSITION TECHNIQUES USING METALLIC IMPLANTS
    DOPPEL, DM
    DAMON, WM
    JOONDEPH, DR
    LITTLE, RM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 105 (02) : 161 - 168