TRAIL EROSION PATTERNS IN "GREAT-SMOKY-MOUNTAINS-NATIONAL-PARK

被引:49
作者
BRATTON, SP
HICKLER, MG
GRAVES, JH
机构
[1] Department of the Interior, National Park Service Southeast Region Uplands Field Research Laboratory, Gatlinburg, 37738, Tennessee, Great Smoky Mountains National Park
关键词
Erosion; Great Smoky Mountains; Park management; Recreational impacts; Trails;
D O I
10.1007/BF01866582
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
All the maintained trails in Great Smoky Mountains National Park were surveyed for width, depth, and a variety of types of erosion. Trail erosion is related to a number of environmental variables, including vegetation type, elevation, trail slope, and section of the park. Open grass balds and spruce-fir forest are the most erosion-sensitive plant communities, and the xeric oak and pine types are the least sensitive. Trails in virgin or mature forest tend to be in poorer condition than those in successional areas. The most important physical factor is the slope of the trail. Trails in the Tennessee district are in slightly poorer condition, on the average, than those in the North Carolina district, but the Appalachian Trail is more eroded than either. A poor section of the park may have ten times the erosion of a good section. On an allpark basis, water erosion is the most important problem, with 15% of the trail surface affected. A comparison of visitation patterns with trail condition indicates that redistribution of use would help to mitigate some erosion problems. Because trail condition is correlated to physical environmental factors, however, some sites will require intensive maintenance, even if visitation is low. The data from this survey have already been used in environmental analysis of proposed developments within the park and can be applied to long-range planning for the park trail system as a whole. © 1979 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 445
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] TRAMPLING EFFECTS ON VEGETATION OF TRAIL CORRIDORS OF NORTH ROCKY-MOUNTAIN FORESTS
    DALE, D
    WEAVER, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1974, 11 (02) : 767 - 772
  • [12] FOIN TC, 1977, ENV MANAGEMENT, V5, P1
  • [13] HADLEY JB, 1963, 349B US GEOL SURV PR, pB1
  • [14] HELGATH SF, 1974, THESIS WASHINGTON ST
  • [15] KING PB, 1964, 349C US GEOL SURV PR, pC1
  • [16] KING PB, 1968, 587 US GEOL SURV PRO
  • [17] LEONARD RE, 1976, APPALACHIA, V42, P20
  • [18] LIDDLE M J, 1975, Biological Conservation, V7, P17, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90028-2
  • [19] MERRIAM LC, 1974, J FOREST, V72, P627
  • [20] NICHOLS R, 1977, ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS L