Measuring Critical Factors of Software Quality Management: Development and Validation of an Instrument

被引:9
作者
Vitharana, Padmal [1 ]
Mone, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Whitman Sch Management, Informat Syst, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sheldon B Lubar Sch Business, Management, Milwaukee, WI 53706 USA
关键词
instrument; management; quality; software; validation;
D O I
10.4018/irmj.2008040102
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Literature presents attributes of effective quality management in building software systems. The value of the capability maturity model (CMM), ISO 9000, and total quality management (TQM) concepts in managing software quality has been widely acknowledged. However, shortcomings of these approaches have also been recognized. For instance, scholars have acknowledged CMM implementation difficulties because of its inherent complexity. This research synthesizes existing literature base in CMM, ISO 9000, TQM, among others, to identify six critical factors of software quality management (SQM) and then develops an instrument that can be used to measure critical factors of SQM. Validity and reliability are established by reviewing extant literature, testing a preliminary version of the instrument among a group of researchers and industry experts, and empirically testing a revised version of the instrument among a group of IS professionals. The instrument is relatively easy to implement and requires minimal resources. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 37
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, NY TIMES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, WALL STREET J, pB6A
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]  
Arthur J., 1993, IMPROVING SOFTWARE Q
[5]  
Bagozzi P., 1980, CAUSAL MODELING MARK
[6]   COMPARING, CONTRASTING ISO-9001 AND THE SEI CAPABILITY MATURITY MODEL [J].
BAMFORD, RC ;
DEIBLER, WJ .
COMPUTER, 1993, 26 (10) :68-70
[7]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[8]  
Chrissis MB, 2003, CMMI GUIDELINES PROC
[9]   PARADIGM FOR DEVELOPING BETTER MEASURES OF MARKETING CONSTRUCTS [J].
CHURCHILL, GA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1979, 16 (01) :64-73
[10]   HOW ISO-9001 FITS INTO THE SOFTWARE WORLD [J].
COALLIER, F .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 1994, 11 (01) :98-100