ORAL PILOCARPINE FOR RADIATION-INDUCED XEROSTOMIA - INTEGRATED EFFICACY AND SAFETY RESULTS FROM 2 PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS

被引:93
作者
RIEKE, JW
HAFERMANN, MD
JOHNSON, JT
LEVEQUE, FG
IWAMOTO, R
STEIGER, BW
MUSCOPLAT, C
GALLAGHER, SC
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH,INST EYE & EAR,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[2] HARPER GRACE HOSP,DETROIT,MI 48201
[3] MGI PHARMA INC,MINNEAPOLIS,MN
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1995年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
PILOCARPINE; RADIATION; XEROSTOMIA; EFFICACY; SAFETY; MULTICENTER TRIALS; HEAD AND NECK CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(94)00361-N
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pilocarpine hydrochloride administered in either a fixed-dose or in a dose-titration protocol three times a day for 12 weeks was evaluated for its abilitly to relieve symptoms of postradiation xerostomia and to improve saliva production. The studies were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trials. A total of 369 patients who had received at least 40 Gy of radiation to the head and neck with clinically significant xerostomia were enrolled in the two studies. In the dose-titration study, 162 patients were enrolled and they received a thrice daily regimen of 2.5 mg tablets for first 4 weeks, 5.0 mg tablets for the second 4 weeks, and 10.0 mg tablets for last 4 weeks of a 12-week study. Patients in the titration study were allowed to down titrate following at least one dose escalation to alleviate bothersome side effects, if any. In the fixed dose study, 207 patients received either placebo, 5.0 mg, or 10.0 mg tablets t.i.d. for 12 weeks. Methods and Materials: Patients were evaluated for symptomatic relief by responding to questionnaires using visual analog scales and categorical questions; and, for saliva production by sialometry. Questionnaires measured relief of intraoral dryness, improvement in overall condition (global response), oral discomfort, difficulty in speaking, chewing and swallowing, denture wearing, and usage of artificial saliva. Evaluations were conducted at baseline, and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Results: There were statistically significant improvements in salivary flow in pilocarpine treatment groups vs. placebo. There was a significant improvement in the overall ''global'' condition of xerostomia associated with the use of pilocarpine in both studies. In the fixed-dose study, there were significant improvements in oral dryness, mouth comfort, ability to speak, and reduction in the use of oral comfort agents. The dose-titration study showed improvements in dryness that approached significance (p = 0.057) and a decreased use of oral comfort agents (p = 0.045). All pilocarpine dosages (2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg three times a day) were judged to be safe. Adverse experiences were those expected for a cholinergic agonist, with the most common being mild to moderate sweating. The incidence of these events increased by dose. Conclusion: It is concluded that in these studies pilocarpine produced clinically significant benefits with acceptable side effects and risks for the treatment of symptomatic postradiation xerostomia. The incidence of most adverse events increased with dose. Best results may require continuous treatment for more than 8 weeks with doses greater than 2.5 mg three times a day. A 5.0 mg thrice daily regimen produced the best clinical results when both efficacy and side effects were taken into consideration. There may be some patients who would experience some additional benefit by increasing the dose to 10 mg thrice daily.
引用
收藏
页码:661 / 669
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bimekizumab Safety in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Pooled Results From Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials
    Gordon, Kenneth B.
    Langley, Richard G.
    Warren, Richard B.
    Okubo, Yukari
    Gold, Linda Stein
    Merola, Joseph F.
    Peterson, Luke
    Wixted, Krista
    Cross, Nancy
    Deherder, Delphine
    Thaci, Diamant
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 158 (07) : 735 - 744
  • [42] RADIATION-INDUCED PROCTOSIGMOIDITIS - PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ORAL SULFASALAZINE PLUS RECTAL STEROIDS VERSUS RECTAL SUCRALFATE
    KOCHHAR, R
    PATEL, F
    DHAR, A
    SHARMA, SC
    AYYAGARI, S
    AGGARWAL, R
    GOENKA, MK
    GUPTA, BD
    MEHTA, SK
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1991, 36 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [43] SAFETY OF INCOBOTULINUMTOXINA IN THE TREATMENT OF FACIAL LINES: RESULTS FROM A POOLED ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE, CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDIES
    Coleman, William P.
    Sattler, Gerhard
    Weissenberger, Petra
    Hast, Michael A.
    Hanschmann, Angelika
    [J]. TOXICON, 2018, 156 : S17 - S17
  • [44] Safety of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Facial Lines: Results From a Pooled Analysis of Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Clinical Studies
    Coleman, William P., III
    Sattler, Gerhard
    Weissenberger, Petra
    Hast, Michael A.
    Hanschmann, Angelika
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2017, 43 : S293 - S303
  • [45] Predicting severe radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients using integrated baseline CT radiomic, dosimetry, and clinical features: A machine learning approach
    Agheli, Razieh
    Siavashpour, Zahra
    Reiazi, Reza
    Azghandi, Samira
    Cheraghi, Susan
    Paydar, Reza
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (03)
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of Dentoxol® in the prevention of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients (ESDOM): a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial
    Rajesh V. Lalla
    Sebastián Solé
    Sergio Becerra
    Claudia Carvajal
    Piero Bettoli
    Hernán Letelier
    Alejandro Santini
    Lorena Vargas
    Alexander Cifuentes
    Francisco Larsen
    Natalia Jara
    Jorge Oyarzún
    Richard Feinn
    Eva Bustamante
    Benjamín Martínez
    David Rosenberg
    Tomas Galván
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020, 28 : 5871 - 5879
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of Dentoxol® in the prevention of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients (ESDOM): a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial
    Lalla, Rajesh V.
    Sole, Sebastian
    Becerra, Sergio
    Carvajal, Claudia
    Bettoli, Piero
    Letelier, Hernan
    Santini, Alejandro
    Vargas, Lorena
    Cifuentes, Alexander
    Larsen, Francisco
    Jara, Natalia
    Oyarzun, Jorge
    Feinn, Richard
    Bustamante, Eva
    Martinez, Benjamin
    Rosenberg, David
    Galvan, Tomas
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (12) : 5871 - 5879
  • [48] Duration of Clinical Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Crow's Feet Lines: Results from Two Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trials
    Baumann, Leslie
    Dayan, Steven
    Connolly, Simon
    Silverberg, Nancy
    Lei, Xiaofang
    Drinkwater, Adrienne
    Gallagher, Conor J.
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2016, 42 (05) : 598 - 607
  • [49] Safety of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor: integrated data analysis from the global chronic plaque psoriasis clinical trials
    Wolk, R.
    Langley, R.
    Cohen, A.
    Foley, P.
    Griffiths, C.
    Lebwohl, M.
    Leonardi, C.
    Winthrop, K.
    Proulx, J.
    Rottinghaus, S.
    Thompson, J.
    Tatulych, S.
    Mallbris, L.
    Swanson, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2016, 30 : 72 - 73
  • [50] Prophylaxis with oral zinc sulfate against radiation-induced oropharyngeal mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer Protocol for a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shuai, Ting
    Yi, Li-Juan
    Tian, Xu
    Chen, Wei-Qing
    Chen, Hui
    Li, Xiu-E
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (48)