Automatic threat processing shows evidence of exclusivity

被引:0
作者
March, David S. [1 ]
Olson, Michael A. [2 ]
Gaertner, Lowell [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tallahassee, FL USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Psychol, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
De Neys argues against assigning exclusive capacities to automatic versus controlled processes. The dual implicit process model provides a theoretical rationale for the exclusivity of automatic threat processing, and corresponding data provide empirical evidence of such exclusivity. De Neys's dismissal of exclusivity is premature and based on a limited sampling of psychological research.
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Ferguson, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2000, 126 (06) :925-945
[2]   Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength [J].
Fazio, Russell H. .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 2007, 25 (05) :603-637
[3]   A time course analysis of the affective priming effect [J].
Hermans, D ;
De Houwer, J ;
Eelen, P .
COGNITION & EMOTION, 2001, 15 (02) :143-165
[4]  
March David S, 2022, Affect Sci, V3, P135, DOI 10.1007/s42761-021-00090-6
[5]   Clarifying the Explanatory Scope of the Dual Implicit Process Model [J].
March, David S. ;
Gaertner, Lowell ;
Olson, Michael A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2018, 29 (01) :38-43
[6]   On the Prioritized Processing of Threat in a Dual Implicit Process Model of Evaluation [J].
March, David S. ;
Gaertner, Lowell ;
Olson, Michael A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2018, 29 (01) :1-13
[7]   In Harm's Way: On Preferential Response to Threatening Stimuli [J].
March, David S. ;
Gaertner, Lowell ;
Olson, Michael A. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2017, 43 (11) :1519-1529