EVALUATION OF LENS OPACITIES CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM-III APPLIED AT THE SLITLAMP

被引:89
作者
KARBASSI, M
KHU, PM
SINGER, DM
CHYLACK, LT
机构
[1] Center for Ophthalmic Research, The Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
[2] Center for Ophthalmic Research, The Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
关键词
LOCS III; SLITLAMP CLASSIFICATION; CATARACT; LENS PHOTOGRAPHY; LOCS II;
D O I
10.1097/00006324-199311000-00009
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The Lens Opacities Classification Systems (LOCS III) was developed and standardized using photograding. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of LOCS III at the slitlamp and to compare slitlamp with photograding. To do so, two independent observers graded cataract at the slitlamp and in photographs from two sets of patients; the first set consisted of 205 eyes (193 acceptable photographs) and the second set of 51 eyes (51 photographs). The 95% tolerance limits (TL) for grading at the slitlamp ranged from 0.9 to 1.8 for the first set and 0.6 to 1.2 for the second (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.79 to 0.91 vs. 0.70 to 0.97, respectively). Specifically, there was a significant decrease in 95% TL for cortical and nuclear color. For the first set of photograding, the 95% TL were 0.3 to 0.6 between the two observers and 0.6 to 0.8 for the same observer at two different sessions. Similar results were found for photograding the second set. The 95% TL for comparing slitlamp and photograding were generally >1.0. The results suggest that (1) LOCS III at the slitlamp has 95% TL only slightly worse than those for LOCS III photogradings; (2) LOCS III slitlamp grading for cortical and nuclear color improves with practice; and (3) the slitlamp and photographic gradings cannot be used interchangeably.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 928
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Chylack L.T., Leske M.C., McCarthy D., Khu P., Kashiwagi T., Sperduto R., Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II), Arch Ophthalmol, 107, pp. 991-997, (1989)
  • [2] Marainl G., Pasquini P., Tomba M.C., Bonacini M., Stazi M.A., Rosmini F., Sperduto R.D., The Italian-American Cataract Study Group. An independent evaluation of the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II), Ophthalmology (Rochester), 96, pp. 611-615, (1989)
  • [3] Leske M.C., (1990)
  • [4] Chylack L.T., Wolfe J.K., Singer D.M., Leske M.C., Bullimore M.A., Bailey I.L., Friend J., McCarthy D., Wu S.Y., For the LSC Study Group. The Lens Opacities Classification System III, Arch Ophthalmol, 111, pp. 831-836, (1993)
  • [5] Chylack L.T., Wolfe J.K., Friend J., Khu P.M., Singer D.M., McCarthy D., Del Carmen J.D., Rosner B., Quantitating cataract and nuclear brunescence, the Harvard and LOCS systems, Optom Vis Sci, 70, (1993)
  • [6] West S., Munoz B., Wang F., Measuring nuclear cataract progression in longitudinal studies, Presented at the Third National Eye Institute Symposium on Eye Disease Epidemiology, 18, pp. 25-27, (1991)
  • [7] Munoz B., West S., Wang F., Taylor H.R., Measuring cataract progression for longitudinal studies, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 32, (1991)
  • [8] Bailey I.L., Bullimore M.A., Raasch T.W., Taylor H.R., Clinical grading and the effects of scaling, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 32, pp. 422-432, (1991)
  • [9] West S.K., Munoz B., Wang F., Taylor H., Measuring progression of lens opacities for longitudinal studies, Curr Eye Res, 12, pp. 123-132, (1993)
  • [10] Chylack L.T., Leske M.C., Sperduto R., Khu P., McCarthy D., The Lens Opacities Case-Control Study Group. The Lens Opacities Classification System, Arch Ophthalmol, 106, pp. 330-334, (1988)