COARSE WOODY DEBRIS AS A REFUGE FROM PREDATION IN AQUATIC COMMUNITIES - AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST

被引:206
作者
EVERETT, RA
RUIZ, GM
机构
[1] Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, 21037, MD
关键词
COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; HABITAT STRUCTURE; PALAEMONETES; REFUGE; RISK OF PREDATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00328954
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study demonstrates experimentally that coarse woody debris (CWD) can provide refuge from predation in aquatic habitats. In the Rhode River subestuary of Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, (USA), we (1) measured the abundance of CWD, (2) examined the utilization of CWD by mobile epibenthic fish and crustaceans, and (3) tested experimentally the value of CWD as a refuge from predation. CWD was the dominant above-bottom physical structure in shallow water, ranging in size from small branches (< 2 cm diameter) to fallen trees (> 50 cm diameter). In response to experimental additions of CWD, densities of common epibenthic species (Callinectes sapidus, Fundulus heteroclitus, Fundulus majalis, Gobiosoma bosc, Gobiesox strumosus, Palaemonetes pugio, and Rithropanopeus harrisii) increased significantly compared to control sites without CWD. In laboratory experiments, grass shrimp (P. pugio) responded to predatory fish (F. heteroclitus and Micropogonias undulatus) by utilizing shelter at CWD more frequently than in the absence of fish. Access to CWD increased survivorship of grass shrimp in laboratory and field experiments. These experimental results (1) support the hypothesis, commonly proposed but untested for freshwater habitats, that CWD can provide a refuge from predation for epibenthic fish and invertebrates and (2) extend the recognized functional importance of CWD in freshwater to estuarine and marine communities. We hypothesize that CWD is an especially important refuge habitat in the many estuarine and freshwater systems for which alternative physical structure (e.g., vegetation or oyster reefs) are absent or in low abundance.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 486
页数:12
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [1] Bahr L.M., 1981, ECOLOGY INTERTIDAL O
  • [2] BARSHAW DE, 1990, FISH B-NOAA, V88, P415
  • [3] Bayer R.D., 1983, Murrelet, V64, P87, DOI 10.2307/3535267
  • [4] BAYER R D, 1981, Murrelet, V62, P56, DOI 10.2307/3534178
  • [5] Bayer RD, 1978, WADING BIRDS, P213
  • [6] BAYLEY S, 1968, Chesapeake Science, V9, P173, DOI 10.1007/BF02688416
  • [7] BECKER G, 1971, MARINE BORERS FUNGI, P303
  • [8] INVERTEBRATE PRODUCTIVITY IN A SUB-TROPICAL BLACKWATER RIVER - THE IMPORTANCE OF HABITAT AND LIFE-HISTORY
    BENKE, AC
    VANARSDALL, TC
    GILLESPIE, DM
    PARRISH, FK
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1984, 54 (01) : 25 - 63
  • [9] Bisson PA., 1987, STREAMSIDE MANAGEMEN, P144, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2011.08.021.SECRETED
  • [10] EFFECTS OF PREDATION-RISK ON HABITAT USE BY HIMALAYAN SNOWCOCKS
    BLAND, JD
    TEMPLE, SA
    [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1990, 82 (02) : 187 - 191