SWITCHING FROM DXA PENCIL-BEAM TO FAN-BEAM .1. STUDIES IN-VITRO AT 4 CENTERS

被引:30
作者
EIKEN, P
BARENHOLDT, O
JENSEN, LB
GRAM, J
NIELSEN, SP
机构
[1] HILLEROD SYGEHUS,DEPT CLIN PHYSIOL,DK-3400 HILLEROD,DENMARK
[2] KOMMUNE HOSP COPENHAGEN,CTR OSTEOPOROSIS,COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[3] ODENSE UNIV HOSP,DEPT MED M,DK-5000 ODENSE,DENMARK
关键词
SPINE; BONE DENSITOMETRY; DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; BONE MINERAL CONTENT; BONE MINERAL DENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/8756-3282(94)90315-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The performance of the Hologic QDR-2000 DXA osteoden-sitometer was critically evaluated at four centers, using at all four centers one bone equivalent humanoid spine phantom supplied by the manufacturer. Results were compared with results from Hologic QDR-1000/W using that phantom tested at the same centers. It appears that the concept of fan-beam scanning-as used in the QDR-2000: a fan-beam, a linear array detector above the phantom, and an x-ray tube located rather close to the spine below the phantom-creates problems due to the magnification effect of the fan beam. The effect of decreasing the distance between the ''vertebrae''' of the phantom and the couch are: bone mineral content (BMC) increases by 2.8% per cm, projected area (Area) by 2.8% per cm, and bone mineral density (BMD) is unchanged. When QDR-1000/W is upgraded to QDR-2000, BMD is relatively constant, but there are shifts of BMC and Area which are partly due to the magnification effect of the fan-beam. Replacement of a QDR-1000/W with a QDR-2000 can invalidate longitudinal measurements, even for BMD, unless the proportionality factors of the QDR-2000 are checked and, if necessary, changed. This is true for switching from QDR-1000/W to pencil-beam mode of QDR-2000 or to fan-beam mode of QDR-2000. Even with pencil-beam mode, the long-term precision error with phantoms is higher for QDR-2000 than for QDR-1000/W (for BMD, 0.47% versus 0.35%).
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 670
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   INTERSITE COMPARISON OF THE HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
TONG, CM ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (761) :440-446
[2]   DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN FAN-BEAM AND PENCIL BEAM SCANS [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
PARKER, JC ;
BUXTON, FMA ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (790) :902-906
[3]  
DEVOGELAER JP, 1992, BATH C OSTEOPOROSIS, P20
[4]  
DUNN W L, 1992, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, V33, P1063
[5]  
EIKEN P, BONE, V15, P671
[6]   CROSS-CALIBRATION OF DXA EQUIPMENT - UPGRADING FROM A HOLOGIC QDR 1000/W TO A QDR-2000 [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
GLUER, CC ;
ESTILO, M ;
GENANT, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 52 (02) :79-84
[7]  
FINKELSTEIN J, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, pS191
[8]  
HARPER KD, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, pS191
[9]  
KELLY TL, 1991, J BONE MINER RES S1, V6, pS168
[10]   INTERPRETATION OF LUMBAR SPINE DENSITOMETRY IN WOMEN WITH FRACTURES [J].
NIELSEN, SP ;
HERMANSEN, F ;
BARENHOLDT, O .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 3 (05) :276-282