Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment in an Adult Patient with a Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion - A Case Report

被引:7
作者
Naragond, Appasaheb [1 ]
Kenganal, Smitha [2 ]
Sagarkar, Roshan [1 ]
Sugaradday [1 ]
机构
[1] PMNM Dent Coll & Hosp Bagalkot, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Karnataka, India
[2] PMNM Dent Coll & Hosp Bagalkot, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Karnataka, India
关键词
Orthodontic camouflage; Class II div 1 malocclusion;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2013/5191.2780
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Since so many decades, various treatment modalities have been presented for the treatment for the class II, div 1 malocclusions. In recent times, we have seen enormously increasing numbers of young adults who desire the shortest, cost effective and a non surgical correction of Class II malocclusions and they accept dental camouflage as a treatment option to mask the skeletal discrepancy. This case report presents one such case of a 22 year old non-growing female who had a skeletal Class II, division 1 malocclusion with an orthognathic maxilla, a retrognathic mandible, a negative VTO and an overjet of 12mm, who did not want a surgical treatment. We considered the camouflage treatment by extracting the upper first premolars. Following the treatment, a satisfactory result was achieved with an ideal, static and a functional occlusion, facial profile, smile and lip competence and stability of the treatment results.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 400
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Class II treatment success rate in 2-and 4-premolar extraction protocols [J].
Janson, G ;
Brambilla, AD ;
Henriques, JFC ;
de Freitas, MR ;
Neves, LS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2004, 125 (04) :472-479
[12]  
Khan R S, 1991, Br J Orthod, V18, P183
[13]  
Kuhlberg A J, 1997, Dent Clin North Am, V41, P17
[14]   THE EFFECT OF MAXILLARY FIRST PREMOLAR EXTRACTION AND INCISOR RETRACTION ON MANDIBULAR POSITION - TESTING THE CENTRAL DOGMA OF FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTICS [J].
LUECKE, PE ;
JOHNSTON, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 101 (01) :4-12
[15]   Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: A comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes [J].
Mihalik, CA ;
Proffit, WR ;
Phillips, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2003, 123 (03) :266-278
[16]  
Moseling KP, 2004, ANGLE ORTHOD, V74, P51
[17]   A LONG-TERM COMPARISON OF NONEXTRACTION AND PREMOLAR EXTRACTION EDGEWISE THERAPY IN BORDERLINE CLASS-II PATIENTS [J].
PAQUETTE, DE ;
BEATTIE, JR ;
JOHNSTON, LE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (01) :1-14
[18]   A COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES OF ORTHODONTIC AND SURGICAL-ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS-II MALOCCLUSION IN ADULTS [J].
PROFFIT, WR ;
PHILLIPS, C ;
DOUVARTZIDIS, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 101 (06) :556-565
[19]  
Ramos AL, 2005, ANGLE ORTHOD, V75, P499