MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED FILLING SYSTEMS - A CASE-STUDY

被引:7
作者
BOUCHER, TO
LUXHOJ, JT
DESCOVICH, T
LITMAN, N
机构
[1] Department of Industrial Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
[2] Center for Advanced Food Technology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ
关键词
MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING; DECISION MAKING; MANUFACTURING INVESTMENT; AUTOMATION; FOOD PROCESSING;
D O I
10.1016/0278-6125(93)90305-D
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Much has been written about the use of multiattribute decision models to evaluate manufacturing technologies. This article describes an application to a real problem using a recently developed multiattribute decision tool. The case study involves an evaluation of three candidate technologies for filling packaged food containers. A manual baseline filling method is compared with the two technology investment options of automated weigh filling and automated volumetric filling. In food industries, the cost of material overfill is important but is not the only factor that should be considered. A multiattribute decision model is formulated that considers difficult-to-quantify criteria, such as material conversion, information conversion, and strategic activities. For the given decision scenario, when only directly measurable annual cost savings are considered, the weigh filler option is preferred; however, when the additional criteria are considered, volumetric filling is preferred primarily due to its product and equipment flexibility. It is proposed that the methodology described here will enhance the acceptability of applying multiattribute decision making to manufacturing investment problems.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 378
页数:22
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Canada, Sullivan, Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, (1989)
[2]  
Falkner, Benhajla, Multiattribute Decision Models in the Justification of CIM Systems, The Engineering Economist, 35, 2, (1990)
[3]  
Arbel, Seidmann, Performance Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, IIE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 14, 4, (1984)
[4]  
Wabalickis, Justification of FMS with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 7, 3, (1988)
[5]  
Boucher, MacStravic, Multi-Attribute Evaluation Within a Present Worth Framework and its Relation to the Analytic Hierarchy Process, The Engineering Economist, 37, 1, (1991)
[6]  
MacStravic, Boucher, Users Manual: NCIC Decision Support Software for Investment in Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (1991)
[7]  
Goldhar, Determining the Best Mean Contents for a Canning Problem, Journal of Quality Technology, 19, 2, (1987)
[8]  
Hunter, Kartha, Determining the Most Profitable Target Value for a Production Process, Journal of Quality Technology, 9, 4, (1977)
[9]  
Melloy, Determining the Optimal Process Measure and Screening Limits for Packages Subject to Compliance Testing, Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 4, (1991)
[10]  
Boucher, Jafari, The Optimum Value for Simple Filling Operations with Quality Sampling Plans, Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 1, (1991)