DEVELOPMENT OF A LABOUR PAIN ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT

被引:1
|
作者
Yazbek, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY | 2016年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
labour pain; labour pain assessment; labour pain measurement;
D O I
10.25159/2520-5293/279
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Labour may impose severe pain, yet women experience the intensity of pain differently. The severity of labour pain is frequently underestimated by women, midwives and clinicians. Pain assessment is considered the key to labour pain measurement and a standardised instrument can assist with adequate management of labour pain. Although a variety of pain assessment/measurement tools were found by a search conducted between 2000 and 2010, the tool charts are detailed and require time to complete, they do not cover all aspects of labour, and they avoid quantifying and documentation of labour pain. Developing a new multidimensional labour pain assessment instrument could assist midwives and clinicians with labour pain control. Ethical permission was obtained from the university Faculty Academic Ethics Committee to develop a new labour pain assessment instrument. Six steps of Blackburn and Waite (2006: 134) guided development of the instrument that measures pain during the first stage of labour. This exploratory sequential mixed method study, using a qualitative and quantitative research design, described the development process of the new instrument. Four focus groups with four to six members comprising midwifery lecturers, midwives working in the private and public hospitals, midwives in private practice and obstetricians were conducted to develop the instrument. The instrument was thereafter given in two Delphi technique rounds to the most senior persons teaching Midwifery at all South African universities to verify the content and structure of the instrument. Data analysis of the focus groups followed the steps of data reduction, data display and verification as proposed by Miles and Huberman (1994: 428-444) and the mean ratings of the Likert scale as determined by the university was presented in tables. The trustworthiness and validity and reliability (truth value) of the instrument were supported by using multiple types of data to develop the instrument. The focus group members and Delphi experts expressed their enthusiasm and appraisement for a new labour pain assessment instrument. A sense of closure (saturation) was attained and the experts concluded that the instrument was ready to be tested.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 26
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Self-hypnosis for coping with labour pain: a randomised controlled trial
    Werner, A.
    Uldbjerg, N.
    Zachariae, R.
    Rosen, G.
    Nohr, E. A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 346 - 353
  • [22] Women's experiences of labour pain and the role of the mind: An exploratory study
    Whitburn, Laura Y.
    Jones, Lester E.
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    Small, Rhonda
    MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (09) : 1029 - 1035
  • [23] Acupuncture versus subcutaneous injections of sterile water as treatment for labour pain
    Martensson, Lena
    Stener-Victorin, Elisabet
    Wallin, Gunnar
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2008, 87 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [24] Acupuncture for pain relief in labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cho, S-H
    Lee, H.
    Ernst, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (08) : 907 - 920
  • [25] The relationship between expectation, experience and perception of labour pain: an observational study
    Aksoy, Huseyin
    Yucel, Burak
    Aksoy, Ulku
    Acmaz, Gokhan
    Aydin, Turgut
    Babayigit, Mustafa Alparslan
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [26] Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a two month follow up of recollection of pain and birth experience
    Linda Vixner
    Lena B. Mårtensson
    Erica Schytt
    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 15
  • [27] Experiences of midwives on pharmacological and non-pharmacological labour pain management in Ghana
    Lydia Aziato
    Abigail A. Kyei
    Godsway Deku
    Reproductive Health, 14
  • [28] Labour Q1 pain – poorly analysed and reported: a systematic review
    Hans Järnbert-Pettersson
    Linda Vixner
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [29] Labour pain control by aromatherapy: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Chen, Shuo-Fei
    Wang, Chia-Hui
    Chan, Pi-Tuan
    Chiang, Hsiu-Wen
    Hu, Tsung-Ming
    Tam, Ka-Wai
    Loh, El-Wui
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (04) : 327 - 335
  • [30] Ethnic differences influence care giver's estimates of pain during labour
    Sheiner, EK
    Sheiner, E
    Shoham-Vardi, I
    Mazor, M
    Katz, M
    PAIN, 1999, 81 (03) : 299 - 305