The EU Emission Trading Scheme: sectoral allocation and factors determining emission changes

被引:5
作者
Kettner, Claudia [1 ]
Kletzan-Slamanig, Daniela [1 ]
Koeppl, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Austrian Inst Econ Res WIFO, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
关键词
EU Emission Trading Scheme; sectoral emissions; policy evaluation; decomposition analysis;
D O I
10.1080/21606544.2014.948492
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Union (EU) Emission Trading Scheme that covers 50% of EU greenhouse gas emissions is the biggest cap-and-trade scheme worldwide. In this article, for three emission-intensive sectors ('power and heat', 'cement and lime' and 'pulp and paper') allocation caps, emission developments and the main emission drivers are analysed. In order to assess what drives emissions and whether emission-saving actions were taken since 2005, a decomposition approach is applied. The analysis reveals pronounced sectoral disparities indicating some emission-reducing activities since 2005; for 'electricity and heat' and 'pulp and paper', these, however, do not deviate from the long-term trend prior to the introduction of the scheme. The occurrence of low CO2 prices emphasises the need for adaptation towards a more effective system.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abrell J., 2011, 201115 BETA
[2]   Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS [J].
Anderson, Barry ;
Di Maria, Corrado .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 48 (01) :83-103
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, STATE TRENDS CARBON
[4]  
[Anonymous], COM200830 EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PRICING CARBON EUROP
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ALLOCATION EUROPEAN
[7]   Detecting instability in the volatility of carbon prices [J].
Chevallier, Julien .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (01) :99-110
[8]  
EC European Commission, 2013, COM2013169 EC
[9]  
Egenhofer C., 2011, EU EMISSIONS TRADING
[10]   Over-allocation or abatement? A preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005-06 emissions data [J].
Ellerman, A. Denny ;
Buchner, Barbara K. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2008, 41 (02) :267-287