Readability of informed consent forms in clinical trials conducted in a skin research center

被引:0
作者
Samadi, Aniseh [1 ]
Asghari, Fariba [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Ctr Res & Training Skin Dis & Leprosy, Pharmaceut Cosmeceut & Hyg Evaluat Lab DermaLab, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Med Eth & Hist Med Res Ctr, 23-16 Azar St,Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran 1417863181, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE | 2016年 / 9卷
关键词
clinical trials; informed consent; readability; literacy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Obtaining informed consents is one of the most fundamental principles in conducting a clinical trial. In order for the consent to be informed, the patient must receive and comprehend the information appropriately. Complexity of the consent form is a common problem that has been shown to be a major barrier to comprehension for many patients. The objective of this study was to assess the readability of different templates of informed consent forms (ICFs) used in clinical trials in the Center for Research and Training in Skin Diseases and Leprosy (CRTSDL), Tehran, Iran. This study was conducted on ICFs of 45 clinical trials of the CRTSDL affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. ICFs were tested for reading difficulty, using the readability assessments formula adjusted for the Persian language including the Flesch-Kincaid reading ease score, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, and Gunning fog index. Mean readability score of the whole text of ICFs as well as their 7 main information parts were calculated. The mean +/- SD Flesch Reading Ease score for all ICFs was 31.96 +/- 5.62 that is in the difficult range. The mean +/- SD grade level was calculated as 10.71 +/- 1.8 (8.23-14.09) using the Flesch-Kincaid formula and 14.64 +/- 1.22 (12.67-18.27) using the Gunning fog index. These results indicate that the text is expected to be understandable for an average student in the 11th grade, while the ethics committee recommend grade level 8 as the standard readability level for ICFs. The results showed that the readability scores of ICFs assessed in our study were not in the acceptable range. This means they were too complex to be understood by the general population. Ethics committees must examine the simplicity and readability of ICFs used in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Health literacy: A review
    Andrus, MR
    Roth, MT
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (03): : 282 - 302
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, GUIDELINES CONDUCT R
  • [3] The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: a critique
    Bailin, A
    Grafstein, A
    [J]. LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION, 2001, 21 (03) : 285 - 301
  • [4] An analysis of the readability characteristics of oral health information literature available to the public in Tasmania, Australia
    Barnett, Tony
    Hoang, Ha
    Furlan, Ashlea
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2016, 16
  • [5] Brangan Sanja, 2015, Coll Antropol, V39, P11
  • [6] Are patient information leaflets contributing to informed consent for cataract surgery?
    Brown, H
    Ramchandani, M
    Gillow, JT
    Tsaloumas, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2004, 30 (02) : 218 - 220
  • [7] The Contents and Readability of Informed Consent Forms for Oncology Clinical Trials
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    Pond, Gregory R.
    Heslegrave, Ronald J.
    Enright, Katherine
    Potanina, Larissa
    Siu, Lillian L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (04): : 387 - 392
  • [8] Dayani MH, 2001, SOME TECHNIQUES CLEA
  • [9] The relevance of receptive vocabulary in reading comprehension
    de Oliveira Nalom, Ana Flavia
    Couto Soares, Aparecido Jose
    Carnio, Maria Silvia
    [J]. CODAS, 2015, 27 (04): : 333 - 338
  • [10] Easy-to-Read Informed Consent Forms for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Clinical Trials
    Denzen, Ellen M.
    Santibanez, Martha E. Burton
    Moore, Heather
    Foley, Amy
    Gersten, Iris D.
    Gurgol, Cathy
    Majhail, Navneet S.
    Spellecy, Ryan
    Horowitz, Mary M.
    Murphy, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (02) : 183 - 189