Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence

被引:11
作者
Labianca, Marilena [1 ]
De Rubertis, Stefano [1 ]
Belliggiano, Angelo [1 ]
Salento, Angelo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salento, Dipartimento Sci Econ, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
来源
STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS | 2016年 / 118卷 / 01期
关键词
LEADER approach; governance; less developed region;
D O I
10.7896/j.1531
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, innovation has been recognised as having a key role in the development and competitiveness of European rural territories. In particular, in the LEADER approach, innovation is seen in social and cultural terms rather than as a technological issue, but it has been interpreted by national and, above all, local policies almost exclusively in the latter sense. Especially at local level, often a 'productivist' approach emerges that in many cases reveals deeply-rooted conservativeness in the planning and implementation of programmes. Puglia, a NUTS 2 region in southern Italy, acknowledges the key role of innovation in rural development and invested a bigger share of funding in Axes III and IV of Pillar 2 of the Common Agricultural Policy in the 2007-2013 programming cycle than did the other Italian regions. This study examines the regional case in two interconnected stages to identify firstly the interpretation of innovation from the programmatic and operative points of view, and secondly, the needs and critical issues in terms of innovation in governance on the local scale through interviews with stake-holders from a representative LAG named 'Terra dei Messapi'. It reveals not only a marked disparity in the way innovation was interpreted, but also the limitations and critical issues in planning and in regional and local governance, which prove unable to embrace innovation affecting social and institutional processes and, more generally, processes related to the context.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RUR DEV EUR UN STAT
[2]   The LEADER Initiative has been a Victim of Its Own Success. The Decline of the Bottom-Up Approach in Rural Development Programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia [J].
Antonio Navarro, Francisco ;
Woods, Michael ;
Cejudo, Eugenio .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2016, 56 (02) :270-288
[3]  
Belliggiano A., 2014, I SVILUPPO TRA COMUN, P89
[4]  
Cacace D., 2010, VALUTAZIONE APPROCCI
[5]  
Camaioni B., 2009, POLITICA SVILUPPO RU, P17
[6]   Mainstreaming LEADER Delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis [J].
Convery, Ian ;
Soane, Ian ;
Dutson, Tom ;
Shaw, Helen .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2010, 50 (04) :370-391
[7]   LEADER and innovation [J].
Dargan, Lorna ;
Shucksmith, Mark .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2008, 48 (03) :274-291
[8]   The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland [J].
Dax, Thomas ;
Strahl, Wibke ;
Kirwan, James ;
Maye, Damian .
EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 2016, 23 (01) :56-68
[9]  
De Rubertis S., 2015, INNOVATIVE MANAGEMEN, P101
[10]  
De Rubertis S., 2013, INNOVAZIONE IMPRESA, P187