The quandaries of social entrepreneurship studies - a discursive review of the discipline

被引:10
作者
Cieslik, Katarzyna [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Ctr Integrat Dev, Knowledge Technol & Innovat KTI, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Social entrepreneurship; literature review; discourse;
D O I
10.1080/00346764.2018.1463446
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to investigate the ways in which social entrepreneurship knowledge is both propelled and hindered by the socioeconomic circumstances. We examine the existing body of research and identify different conceptualizations and main schools of thought. We then demonstrate how the process of constructing academic representation is shaped by the prevalent public discourses. Our analysis leads to the differentiation between social entrepreneurship as mitigation and social entrepreneurship as transformation. We conclude that a better alignment of the two approaches - broadening research focus from outcome to process - would reveal their complementarity and contribute to the conceptual advancement of the discipline. We propose expanding the existing approaches with the politics of social entrepreneurship studies and stress the importance of increased reflexivity on the plight of the new discipline.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 376
页数:25
相关论文
共 149 条
  • [11] Bhaskar Roy, 2009, SCI REALISM HUMAN EM
  • [12] Bibby A., 2002, CLIMBING LEDDER STEP
  • [13] Bornstein D, 2004, CHANGE WORLD SOCIAL
  • [14] Bornstein D., 1998, ATLANTIC
  • [15] Bornstein D., 2010, SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS
  • [16] Boschee J., 2003, BETTER UNDERSTANDING
  • [17] Boschee J., 2006, MIGRATING INNOVATION
  • [18] Bourdieu P., 1984, SCI SCI REFLEXIVITE
  • [19] New public management and substantive democracy
    Box, RC
    Marshall, GS
    Reed, BJ
    Reed, CM
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2001, 61 (05) : 608 - 619
  • [20] Brouard F, 2010, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP, P29