Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary

被引:2
作者
Nuyen, A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Confucius; Confucianism; existentialism; Mencius; role ethics; role-based ethics;
D O I
10.1558/ccp.v4i1.141
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In his new book, Ames defends his interpretation of Confucian ethics as "role ethics" through a detailed examination of the Confucian vocabulary. Through such vocabulary, we can see that the Confucian self is a being that cultivates itself as it lives and matures in the context of the family and society. As role ethics, Confucianism is distinct from the Western tradition and its Greek roots. However, in order to highlight the contrast between Confucianism and the Western tradition, Ames paints a picture of the latter that is a little misleading. As it turns out, there are many strands in the Western philosophical fabric, including those in the Continental tradition, where we can find conceptions of the self not all that different from what is in Confucianism as interpreted by Ames.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Ames Roger T., 2011, CONFUCIAN ROLE ETHIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SOURCES SELF
[3]  
Emmet Dorothy, 1966, RULES ROLES RELATION
[4]  
Gasset Ortega, 1941, HIST SYSTEM OTHER ES
[5]  
Kierkegaard S., 2009, CONCLUDING UNSCIENTI
[6]  
May Larry., 1992, SHARING RESPONSIBILI
[7]  
Sartre J.-P., 1936, TRANSCENDENCE EGO
[8]  
Smiley M, 1992, MORAL RESPONSIBILITY
[9]  
Taylor Mark C., 1984, ERRING POSTMODERN TH