Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in higher education

被引:40
作者
Ho, William [1 ]
Dey, Prasanta [1 ]
Higson, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Operat & Informat Management Grp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Aston Univ, Undergrad Programme, Undergrad Studies, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Higher education; Resource allocation; Performance measurement (quality); Decision making;
D O I
10.1108/09513540610676403
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature which focuses on four major higher education decision problems. These are: resource allocation; performance measurement; budgeting; and scheduling. D Design/methodology/approach - Related articles appearing in the international journals from 1996 to 2005 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: "What kind of decision problems were paid most attention to?"; "Were the multiple criteria decision-making techniques prevalently adopted?"; and "What are the inadequacies of these approaches?" Findings - Based on the inadequacies, some improvements and possible future work are recommended, and a comprehensive resource allocation model is developed taking account of these factors. Finally, a new knowledge-based goal programming technique which integrates some operations of analytic hierarchy process is proposed to tackle the model intelligently. Originality/value - Higher education has faced the problem of budget cuts or constrained budgets for the past 30 years. Managing the process of the higher education system is, therefore, a crucial and urgent task for the decision makers of universities in order to improve their performance or competitiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement
    Adcroft, Andy
    Willis, Robert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) : 386 - +
  • [2] Al-Turki U., 2003, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V17, P330, DOI [10.1108/09513540310501012, DOI 10.1108/09513540310501012]
  • [3] ALHO JM, 2000, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V14, P95
  • [4] ANDERSON DR, 2005, INTRO MANAGEMENT SCI
  • [5] [Anonymous], QUALITY ASSURANCE ED
  • [6] Badri M.A., 2004, INT J EDUC MANAG, V18, P224, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513540410538813
  • [7] Borgia C. R, 1996, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V7, P467
  • [8] Efficient assignment of financial resources within a university system.: Study of the University of Malaga
    Caballero, R
    Galache, T
    Gómez, T
    Molina, J
    Torrico, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 133 (02) : 298 - 309
  • [9] Charnes A., 1961, MANAGEMENT MODELS IN
  • [10] Cullen J., 2003, QUAL ASSUR EDUC, V11, P5, DOI 10.1108/09684880310462038