Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in higher education

被引:41
作者
Ho, William [1 ]
Dey, Prasanta [1 ]
Higson, Helen [2 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Operat & Informat Management Grp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Aston Univ, Undergrad Programme, Undergrad Studies, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Higher education; Resource allocation; Performance measurement (quality); Decision making;
D O I
10.1108/09513540610676403
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the literature which focuses on four major higher education decision problems. These are: resource allocation; performance measurement; budgeting; and scheduling. D Design/methodology/approach - Related articles appearing in the international journals from 1996 to 2005 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: "What kind of decision problems were paid most attention to?"; "Were the multiple criteria decision-making techniques prevalently adopted?"; and "What are the inadequacies of these approaches?" Findings - Based on the inadequacies, some improvements and possible future work are recommended, and a comprehensive resource allocation model is developed taking account of these factors. Finally, a new knowledge-based goal programming technique which integrates some operations of analytic hierarchy process is proposed to tackle the model intelligently. Originality/value - Higher education has faced the problem of budget cuts or constrained budgets for the past 30 years. Managing the process of the higher education system is, therefore, a crucial and urgent task for the decision makers of universities in order to improve their performance or competitiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement [J].
Adcroft, Andy ;
Willis, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) :386-+
[2]  
Al-Turki U., 2003, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V17, P330, DOI [10.1108/09513540310501012, DOI 10.1108/09513540310501012]
[3]  
ALHO JM, 2000, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V14, P95
[4]  
ANDERSON DR, 2005, INTRO MANAGEMENT SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY ASSURANCE ED
[6]  
Badri M.A., 2004, INT J EDUC MANAG, V18, P224, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513540410538813
[7]  
Borgia C. R, 1996, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V7, P467
[8]   Efficient assignment of financial resources within a university system.: Study of the University of Malaga [J].
Caballero, R ;
Galache, T ;
Gómez, T ;
Molina, J ;
Torrico, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 133 (02) :298-309
[9]  
Charnes A., 1961, MANAGEMENT MODELS IN
[10]  
Cullen J., 2003, QUAL ASSUR EDUC, V11, P5, DOI 10.1108/09684880310462038