An Institutional Perspective on Business Planning Activities for Nascent Entrepreneurs in Sweden and the US

被引:8
作者
Honig, Benson [1 ]
Karlsson, Tomas [2 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Degroote Sch Business, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada
[2] Chalmers Univ, Dept Managing Org Renewal & Entrepreneurship MORE, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
institutional theory; cross national entrepreneurship; business planning;
D O I
10.3390/admsci3040266
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We compared nascent characteristics and behaviors leading to business planning activities in Sweden with the United States (US), examining the effects of institutional pressures exerted in the different countries. We analyzed institutional factors leading 362 Swedish and 347 US entrepreneurs to write plans during a two-year period. We show that national cultures moderate how institutional pressures influence nascent behaviors, questioning generic applications of institutional theory. We found business planning behaviors moderated by nationality, showing significant and negative effects for business classes in the US. Implications are drawn for institutional theory and the study of nascent businesses, as well as for normative business planning literature and practice of nascent businesses.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 289
页数:24
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Bhide A.V., The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses, (2000)
[2]  
Karlsson T., Honig B., Judging a book by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan, J. Bus. Ventur, 24, pp. 27-45, (2009)
[3]  
Perry S., The relationship between written business plans and the failure of small business in the U.S, J. Small Bus. Manag, 39, pp. 201-208, (2001)
[4]  
March J., Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice, Rand J. Econ, 9, pp. 587-608, (1978)
[5]  
Sarasvathy S., Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Experience, (2008)
[6]  
Sarasvathy S.D., Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency, Acad. Manag. Rev, 26, pp. 243-263, (2001)
[7]  
Reynolds P., Who starts firms? Preliminary explorations of firms in gestation, Small Bus. Econ, 9, pp. 449-462, (1997)
[8]  
Cassia L., de Massis A., Meoli M., Minola T., Entrepreneurship research centers around the world: Research orientation, knowledge transfer and performance, J. Technol. Transf, pp. 1-17, (2013)
[9]  
Davidsson P., Hunter E., Klofsten M., Institutional forces: The invisible hand that shapes venture ideas?, Int. Small Bus. J, 24, pp. 115-131, (2006)
[10]  
Honig B., Learning Strategies and resources for entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs, Entrep. Theory Pract, 26, 1, pp. 21-35, (2001)