A Comparative Study of Transdermal Buprenorphine and Oral Morphine in the Treatment of Chronic Pain of Malignant Origin

被引:10
作者
Choudhury, Kakali [1 ]
Dasgupta, Partha [1 ]
Paul, Nishana [1 ]
Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhajna [1 ]
Roy, Bodhisatta [1 ]
Maity, Shampa [1 ]
机构
[1] RG Kar Med Coll, Dept Radiotherapy, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
关键词
Cancer pain; oral morphine; transdermal buprenorphine;
D O I
10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_83_18
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: The study was designed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of buprenorphine transdermal (TD) against oral morphine in pain management of cancer patient. Methods: A randomized open-labeled prospective study was done in palliative cancer pain clinic in a tertiary care medical college between August 2017 and January 2018, to compare the efficacy (pain assessed by VAS) and adverse events (CTCAEv4) between aim A, buprenorphine TD, (20 mu g/h,extended 7 days formulation) and aim B, oral morphine (10mg immediate releasing formulation). Patients with solid tumour malignancies with VAS score >40 (moderate to severe pain) were included in study. Results: 63 patients were analyzed. Commonest primary cancers were breast in females and head and neck in male individuals in both anus. Initial VAS score of arm A and arm B were 81.25 and 82.26 respectively. By 1st week, 11 arm A patients were relieved from pain. Another 17 patients of arm A became pain free by 2nd week, total dose of 40 mu g/h. Only 4 patients needed 60 mu g/h for pain relief. In arm B, 2 patients were relieved by 1 week with total 30mg/day morphine, 11 patients were relieved with 60 mg/day by 2nd week and 12 patients with 90 mg/day. 6 patients were relieved with 120 mg/day dose at the end of 4th week. Nausea and constipation were stastically higher in Arm B compared to that of Arm-A. Conclusions: TD Buprenorphine had similar efficacy with oral morphine, with better toxicity profile and better compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 504
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Efficacy and tolerability of a new opioid analgesic formulation, buprenorphine transdermal therapeutic system (TDS), in the treatment of patients with chronic pain.: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Böhme, K ;
Likar, R .
PAIN CLINIC, 2003, 15 (02) :193-202
[2]  
Budd K, 2003, INT J CLIN PRACT, P9
[3]  
Castro JA, 2016, REV MED HOSP GEN MEX, V79, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.hgmx.2016.05.008
[4]   Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature [J].
Deandrea, S. ;
Montanari, M. ;
Moja, L. ;
Apolone, G. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (12) :1985-1991
[5]   BUPRENORPHINE - NEW POTENT LONG-ACTING SYNTHETIC ANALGESIC - COMPARISON WITH MORPHINE [J].
DOWNING, JW ;
LEARY, WP ;
WHITE, ES .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1977, 49 (03) :251-255
[6]  
Freye Enno, 2007, Pain Pract, V7, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2007.00119.x
[7]  
Gutstein HB, 2001, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P569
[8]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING BUPRENORPHINE AND DIAMORPHINE FOR CHEST PAIN IN SUSPECTED MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
HAYES, MJ ;
FRASER, AR ;
HAMPTON, JR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 2 (6185) :300-302
[9]   Challenging the equipotency calculation for transdermal buprenorphine: four case studies [J].
Likar, R. ;
Krainer, B. ;
Sittl, R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 62 (01) :152-156
[10]   Buprenorphine in long-term control of chronic pain in cancer patients [J].
Pace, Maria Caterina ;
Beatrice Passavanti, Maria ;
Grella, Elisa ;
Mazzariello, Luigi ;
Maisto, Massimo ;
Barbarisi, Manlio ;
Baccari, Ena ;
Sansone, Pasquale ;
Aurilio, Caterina .
FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2007, 12 :1291-1299