Choosing Medical Assessments: Does the Multiple-choice Question make the Grade?

被引:16
作者
Pham, Hannah [1 ]
Trigg, Monique [2 ]
Wu, Shaopeng [1 ]
O'Connell, Alice [1 ]
Harry, Christopher [1 ]
Barnard, John [2 ]
Devitt, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Excel Psychol & Educ Consultancy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Item-writing flaws; inter-rater reliability; medical assessment; multiple-choice question; short-answer question;
D O I
10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The multiple-choice question (MCQ) has been shown to measure the same constructs as the short-answer question (SAQ), yet the use of the latter persists. The study aims to evaluate whether assessment using the MCQ alone provides the same outcomes as testing with the SAQ. Methods: A prospective study design was used. A total of 276 medical students participated in a mock examination consisting of forty MCQs paired to forty SAQs, each pair matched in cognitive skill level and content. Each SAQ was marked by three independent markers. The impact of item-writing flaws (IWFs) on examination outcome was also evaluated. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.75 for the year IV examinations and 0.68 for the year V examinations. MCQs were more prone to IWFs than SAQs, but the effect when present in the latter was greater. Removal of questions containing IWFs from the year V SAQ allowed 39% of students who would otherwise have failed to pass. Discussion: The MCQ can test higher order skills as effectively as the SAQ and can be used as a single format in written assessment provided quality items testing higher order cognitive skills are used. IWFs can have a critical role in determining pass/fail results.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 71
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing [J].
Abdulghani, Hamza Mohammad ;
Ahmad, Farah ;
Irshad, Mohammad ;
Khalil, Mahmoud Salah ;
Al-Shaikh, Ghadeer Khalid ;
Syed, Sadiqa ;
Aldrees, Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman ;
Alrowais, Norah ;
Haque, Shafiul .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
[2]   The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality [J].
Ali, Syed Haris ;
Ruit, Kenneth G. .
PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 4 (05) :244-251
[3]  
Baig M, 2014, PAK J MED SCI, V30, P3, DOI 10.12669/pjms.301.4458
[4]  
Bloom B. S, 1956, TAXONOMY ED, V1st
[5]   The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: The consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education [J].
Downing, SM .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2005, 10 (02) :133-143
[6]  
Falk B, 1995, AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT
[7]  
Haladyna T.M., 1989, APPL MEAS EDUC, V2, P37, DOI [10.1207/s15324818ame0201_3, DOI 10.1207/S15324818AME0201_3]
[8]   Should essays and other open-ended -type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine? [J].
Hift, Richard J. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 14
[9]  
Mahmood H, 2015, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V25, P185, DOI 03.2015/JCPSP.185188
[10]   Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: Modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper [J].
Palmer E.J. ;
Devitt P.G. .
BMC Medical Education, 7 (1)