Complexity in linguistic theorizing

被引:3
作者
Karlsson, Fred [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
complexity; language complexity; syntactic complexity; morphological complexity; linguistic theory; linguistic theorizing; markedness; markedness theory; evaluation measure;
D O I
10.1075/ml.9.2.01kar
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The general notion of 'complexity' is discussed based on foundational ideas by Herbert Simon and Nicholas Rescher. An analytic overview is provided of the ways in which language complexity has been treated in linguistic theories during the past 200 years. The Schlegel brothers, Humboldt, and Schleicher developed the first theory of complexity with their tripartition of languages into progressively complex morphological types. Humboldt also provided the principle of One Meaning - One Form (Humboldt's Universal) which has turned out to be a widespread tendency in the simplification of morphological complexity. Jespersen's Ease Theory has been influential in highlighting many instances of phonological change. The main contribution of Structuralism was Markedness Theory, the idea that language at all levels is built on minimal oppositions where one term (e.g. voiceless or singular) is more basic than its complex counterpart (e.g. voiced or plural). Syntactic complexity came to the fore with the theory of Immediate Constituents giving tools for measuring syntactic depth. Generative linguistics tried to measure syntactic complexity by devising Evaluation Measures based on symbol counting. Current linguistics offers a plethora of empirical studies at all levels, invoking considerations of both system, processing, and cognitive complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 169
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Investigating the interrelationship between rated L2 proficiency and linguistic complexity in L2 speech [J].
Bulte, Bram ;
Roothooft, Hanne .
SYSTEM, 2020, 91
[32]   Linguistic complexity in teachers' assessment of German essays in high stakes testing [J].
Riemenschneider, Anja ;
Weiss, Zarah ;
Schroeter, Pauline ;
Meurers, Detmar .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2021, 50
[33]   Linguistic and extralinguistic variables for the complexity of tonal systems: the case of African languages [J].
Burov, Ivaylo .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, 2021, 33 (02) :59-108
[34]   Towards Measures of Complexity: Applying Structural and Linguistic Metrics to German Laws [J].
Waltl, Bernhard ;
Matthes, Florian .
LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2014, 271 :153-162
[35]   Through the compression glass: language complexity and the linguistic structure of compressed strings [J].
Ehret, Katharina .
LINGUISTICS VANGUARD, 2024, 10 (01) :575-585
[36]   Increase in Linguistic Complexity in Older Adults During COVID-19 [J].
Karabin, Megan ;
Kyröläinen, Aki-Juhani ;
Kuperman, Victor .
EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2024, 50 (03) :312-330
[37]   Complexity of STG signals and linguistic rhythm: a methodological study for EEG data [J].
Pereira, Silvana Silva ;
Ozer, Ege Ekin ;
Sebastian-Galles, Nuria .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2024, 34 (02)
[38]   The effects of task complexity on linguistic complexity and perception in English native speakers' and L2 speakers' argumentative writing [J].
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi ;
Lee, Jongbong .
LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2025, 34 (01) :119-144
[39]   A corpus-based developmental investigation of linguistic complexity in children's writing [J].
Hsiao, Yaling ;
Dawson, Nicola J. ;
Banerji, Nilanjana ;
Nation, Kate .
APPLIED CORPUS LINGUISTICS, 2024, 4 (01)
[40]   Linguistic complexity measures of short narrative writings for modeling overall Chinese proficiency [J].
Xu, Qin ;
Sawaki, Yasuyo ;
Zhu, Yu .
SYSTEM, 2024, 121