Complexity in linguistic theorizing

被引:3
作者
Karlsson, Fred [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
complexity; language complexity; syntactic complexity; morphological complexity; linguistic theory; linguistic theorizing; markedness; markedness theory; evaluation measure;
D O I
10.1075/ml.9.2.01kar
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The general notion of 'complexity' is discussed based on foundational ideas by Herbert Simon and Nicholas Rescher. An analytic overview is provided of the ways in which language complexity has been treated in linguistic theories during the past 200 years. The Schlegel brothers, Humboldt, and Schleicher developed the first theory of complexity with their tripartition of languages into progressively complex morphological types. Humboldt also provided the principle of One Meaning - One Form (Humboldt's Universal) which has turned out to be a widespread tendency in the simplification of morphological complexity. Jespersen's Ease Theory has been influential in highlighting many instances of phonological change. The main contribution of Structuralism was Markedness Theory, the idea that language at all levels is built on minimal oppositions where one term (e.g. voiceless or singular) is more basic than its complex counterpart (e.g. voiced or plural). Syntactic complexity came to the fore with the theory of Immediate Constituents giving tools for measuring syntactic depth. Generative linguistics tried to measure syntactic complexity by devising Evaluation Measures based on symbol counting. Current linguistics offers a plethora of empirical studies at all levels, invoking considerations of both system, processing, and cognitive complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 169
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Linguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality [J].
Zhang, Yujie ;
Ouyang, Jinghui .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2023, 56
[22]   A Cross-Linguistic Speech Error Investigation of Functional Complexity [J].
Sheri Wells-Jensen .
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2007, 36 :107-157
[23]   Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance [J].
Kormos, Judit .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2011, 20 (02) :148-161
[24]   A cross-linguistic speech error investigation of functional complexity [J].
Wells-Jensen, Sheri .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2007, 36 (02) :107-157
[25]   Boundary Crossing and Reflexivity: Navigating the Complexity of Cultural and Linguistic Identity [J].
Kassis-Henderson, Jane ;
Cohen, Linda ;
McCulloch, Rosalind .
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2018, 81 (03) :304-327
[26]   Historiography of the notion of linguistic complexity in three moments in the history of linguistics [J].
Leal, Ednei da Silva .
REVISTA LETRAS, 2021, 104 :186-208
[27]   CTAP for Chinese: A linguistic Complexity Feature Automatic Calculation Platform [J].
Cui, Yue ;
Zhu, Junhui ;
Yang, Liner ;
Fang, Xuezhi ;
Chen, Xiaobin ;
Wang, Yujie ;
Yang, Erhong .
LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2022, :5525-5538
[28]   The effects of topic familiarity on emotionality and linguistic complexity in EAP writing [J].
Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud ;
Bui, Gavin ;
Wang, Yizhou .
LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2024, 28 (04) :1616-1634
[29]   Examining scientific writing styles from the perspective of linguistic complexity [J].
Lu, Chao ;
Bu, Yi ;
Wang, Jie ;
Ding, Ying ;
Torvik, Vetle ;
Schnaars, Matthew ;
Zhang, Chengzhi .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 70 (05) :462-475
[30]   Big data, organizational learning, and sensemaking: Theorizing interpretive challenges under conditions of dynamic complexity [J].
Calvard, Thomas Stephen .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2016, 47 (01) :65-82