THE MANDIBULAR INCISOR - RETHINKING GUIDELINES FOR POST AND CORE DESIGN

被引:33
作者
GLUSKIN, AH
RADKE, RA
FROST, SL
WATANABE, LG
机构
[1] UNIV PACIFIC, SCH DENT, DEPT FIXED PROSTHODONT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 USA
[2] TUFTS UNIV, SCH DENT MED, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, SCH DENT, DEPT RESTORAT DENT, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80554-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In post and core research, little attention has been given to the tooth with minimal bulk and mesial-distal width. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate retention and fracture characteristics of lower incisors restored with variable dowel designs. Fifty freshly extracted mandibular incisors were endodontically treated. Four groups of 10 teeth, decoronalized and dowel- and core-restored, were tested for retention characteristics and fracture resistance. One group of 10 teeth restored with composite resin in intact natural crowns acted as controls. Dowel variables included a prefabricated round cross-sectional design and a morphologic dowel that reproduced the canal space. A universal testing machine created tensile and transverse loads, and failure was measured and recorded. Results showed no difference in resistance to transverse loading between morphological and standardized dowels (p > 0.05). However, when analyzing modes of failure, a ferruled morphological post and core design was less likely to result in a catastrophic root or post fracture. in addition, morphological dowels were significantly more retentive than standardized round dowels in teeth with narrow cross-sections (p = 0.007). This study also reaffirmed the findings of previous investigations, that the intact natural crown of an endodontically treated tooth provides maximum resistance to root fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 37
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Robbins, Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, J Am Dent Assoc, 120, pp. 558-566, (1990)
[2]  
Kahn, Selecting a post system, J Am Dent Assoc, 122, pp. 70-71, (1991)
[3]  
Standlee, Caputo, Hanson, Retention of endodontic dowels effects of cement dowel length diameter and design, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 39, pp. 400-405, (1978)
[4]  
Sorensen, Engelman, Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp. 419-424, (1990)
[5]  
Barkhordar, Radke, Abbasi, Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture, J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp. 676-678, (1989)
[6]  
Mattison, Delvanis, Thacker, Hassel, Effect of post preparation on the apical seal, The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 52, pp. 489-491, (1984)
[7]  
Tjan, Whang, Retentive properties of some simplified dowelcore systems to cast gold dowel and core, J Prosthet Dent, 50, pp. 203-206, (1983)
[8]  
Ruemping, Lund, Schnell, Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces, J Prosthet Dent, 41, pp. 159-162, (1979)
[9]  
Radke, Barkhordar, Podesta, Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents, J Prosthet Dent, 59, pp. 318-320, (1988)
[10]  
Tjan, Whang, Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls, J Prosthet Dent, 53, pp. 496-500, (1985)