Bringing Science and Technology Studies into Agricultural Anthropology: Technology Development as Cultural Encounter between Farmers and Researchers

被引:22
作者
Crane, Todd [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Int Livestock Res Inst Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] CCAFS, Program, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
participation; technology; development; science and technology studies; Mali;
D O I
10.1111/cuag.12028
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The "farmer-back-to-farmer" model of agricultural development, pioneered by Robert Rhoades and Robert Booth, urged technologists to use farmers' knowledge and practices as both the starting point for technological innovations as well as the ultimate measure of the value of innovation. This approach was premised upon close ethnographic study of farmers' livelihoods, especially how technical agricultural practices interacted with household dynamics, community structures, and cultural values. However, the original "farmer-back-to-farmer" approach left the "expert" practice of science and technology as an implicitly practical and apolitical space rather than as a subject of ethnographic study. The increasing and diverse articulation of farmers' livelihood practices with the professional practices of agricultural scientists demands theoretical tools that bring them all into the same frame of analysis. This article proposes that the integration of agricultural anthropology and science and technology studies provides a well-balanced toolkit for analyzing participatory technology development as a space of cultural encounter.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   DISMANTLING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE [J].
AGRAWAL, A .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1995, 26 (03) :413-439
[2]  
Akpo Essegbemon, COPRODUCTION KNOWLED
[3]  
Almekinders C, 2006, BRINGING FARMERS BAC, V5
[4]   The joint development of JM-12.7: A technographic description of the making of a bean variety [J].
Almekinders, C. J. M. .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2011, 57 (3-4) :207-216
[5]   Collaboration of farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective [J].
Almekinders, CJM ;
Elings, A .
EUPHYTICA, 2001, 122 (03) :425-438
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NAKED SCI ANTHR INQU
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF FARMER PARTICIPATION ON THE MANAGEMENT OF ON-FARM TRIALS [J].
ASHBY, JA .
AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION AND EXTENSION, 1987, 25 (04) :235-252
[8]   METHODOLOGY FOR THE PARTICIPATION OF SMALL FARMERS IN THE DESIGN OF ON-FARM TRIALS [J].
ASHBY, JA .
AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION, 1986, 22 (01) :1-19
[9]  
Badini O., 2005, Conflict, social capital and managing natural resources: a West African case study, P143, DOI 10.1079/9780851999487.0143
[10]   Warming up to climate change: a participatory approach to engaging with agricultural stakeholders in the Southeast US [J].
Bartels, Wendy-Lin ;
Furman, Carrie A. ;
Diehl, David C. ;
Royce, Fred S. ;
Dourte, Daniel R. ;
Ortiz, Brenda V. ;
Zierden, David F. ;
Irani, Tracy A. ;
Fraisse, Clyde W. ;
Jones, James W. .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2013, 13 :S45-S55