Remedies in Investment Treaty Arbitration

被引:7
作者
Demirkol, Berk [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Galatasaray, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT | 2015年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnlids/idv012
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The subject of remedies in investment treaty arbitration is one of the issues that have not been elaborated extensively yet. This article aims to shrink this gap. To find out the remedies that are available in the investment arbitration mechanism and compatible with investment disputes, it first examines the systemic features of investment treaty arbitration (rules, policy considerations, parties' interests) regarding applicable remedies. Then, it focuses on the scope of protection of different kinds of rights held by investors. It emphasizes that investment treaty undertakings do not trigger the application of the same remedies as property and contractual rights do. In the light of these findings, this article attempts to ascertain when remedies such as restitution, cessation of the wrongful act and specific performance are available in investment treaty arbitration.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 426
页数:24
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1928, PCIJ A, V17, P47
[2]  
Arangio-Ruiz G, 1988, ONE ILC YB, ps121
[3]  
Braun TR, 2013, JM WP SER, V04, P20
[4]  
Brower Charles N., 2008, ARB INT, V24, P181
[5]  
Brower CN, 1998, IRAN US CLAIMS TRIBU, P476
[6]  
Brown Chester, 2007, COMMON LAW INT ADJUD, P193
[7]  
Crawford, 2010, LAW INT RESPONSIBILI
[8]  
Crawford J, 2013, CAMB STUD INT COMP, V100, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139033060
[9]  
Crawford J., 2008, ARB INT, V24, P351
[10]   Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility [J].
Crawford, James S. C. .
ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2010, 25 (01) :127-199